FROM:
Alternative Medicine Review 2000 (Dec); 5 (6): 502–545 ~ FULL TEXT
Parris M. Kidd, PhD
From the FULL TEXT Article:
Introduction
Parkinson's disease (PD) is the most common disease of motor system
degeneration and, after Alzheimer's disease, the second most common neurodegenerative
disease. [1] Parkinson's disease takes a heavy toll in mental anguish, lost
productivity, and health care expenditures. PD prominently features dopamine
transmitter insufficiency, and current management is almost exclusively
reliant on dopamine replacement drugs. But, while these drugs are initially
effective in most patients, they do not slow the underlying degeneration
in the area of the brain most affected, the substantia nigra (SN). Their
effectiveness declines over time and their adverse effects become increasingly
more troublesome. Broader options for long-term management are urgently
needed.
Many different lines of evidence have converged to suggest PD is primarily
an oxidative disease, fueled by endogenous susceptibility and driven by
the cumulative contributions of endogenous and exogenous (environmental)
oxidant stressors. In this review the evidence for the various oxidative
contributions to PD is critiqued, from the perspective of developing a
more effective and necessarily more integrative strategy for its medical
management.
A Disease of Progressive Neurodegeneration
Parkinson’s disease was first described
in 1817 by the physician James Parkinson. [2]
Prior to this, accounts of the symptoms were
remarkably scarce, which led many researchers
to theorize whether this disease may have
been a product of the beginning of the early
19th century and the Industrial Revolution in
England. [1] Some speculated that, because certain
environmental neurotoxins cause
Parkinson’s-like (“parkinsonian”) symptoms,
some contaminant in the new industrial environment
may have increased its prevalence.
This debate has continued to the present, with
the evidence steadily accumulating in favor of
oxidative causation linked to environmental
toxins.
Parkinson’s disease is widespread in
Westernized countries. In the United States,
for example, as many as one million people
have PD with more than 50,000 new cases
being diagnosed each year. [1] The disease is
highly age-dependent: it can manifest as early
as the mid–30s, but becomes more common
past the age of 50, with 57 being the average
age of diagnosis in the United States. Its prevalence
in the over–50s U.S. population is above
one percent, and in the over–80 population
likely exceeds five percent. [3] PD is becoming
more common with the overall aging of populations.
Parkinson’s disease often first becomes
noticeable as tremor in a limb, and as it
progresses three other unmistakable symptoms
arise: [1–3] bradykinesia (slowness of movement);
rigidity (both “cogwheel”/jerkiness and “leadpipe”/
stiffness); and posture instability with
impaired gait, associated with the stooped
stance characteristic of the disease. Bradykinesia
may cause the patient to feel glued to
the ground or to the chair in which they sit,
and progressively erases body language and
facial expressiveness. The disease is not restricted
to motor degeneration — as many as
35 percent of PD cases also develop dementia. [5]
Parkinson’s disease is now recognized
to be a widespread degenerative illness that
affects not just the central nervous system, but
also the peripheral and enteric systems. [4] Formerly
the disease was typecast as motor system
degeneration, yet sensory fields, association
areas, and premotor fields become damaged
throughout the brain (Figure 1). The limbic,
autonomic, and neurosecretory control
fields (hypothalamus) all show micro-anatomic
damage. At the cellular level, neuron
death in PD is more systemic than previously
assumed: non-invasive imaging recently demonstrated
that the nerve supply to the heart
degenerates in PD subjects. [6] Biochemically,
abnormalities of liver detoxification and mitochondrial
oxidative phosphorylation also
occur. [7, 8]
The pathological process that underlies
PD typically is slow-paced but relentlessly
progressive, the clinical symptoms tending to
manifest relatively late in the pathological progression.
Classically, the hallmark of PD has
been degeneration of dopamine-producing
neurons in the relatively small SN, most intensely
localized in the zona compacta. The
definitive Parkinson’s disease diagnosis is still
posthumous, the key features being neuron
death in the SN accompanied by the presence
of Lewy bodies and Lewy neurites. [9]
Normally, dopamine produced in the
SN is moved to the caudate nucleus and the
putamen, where it is involved in stimulating
and coordinating the body’s motor movements.
In PD, neurons producing dopamine in the SN
die, reducing the overall supply of dopamine
and compromising the brain’s capacity to effectuate
movement. Curiously, dopamine-producing
neurons outside of the SN tend not to
be affected, though many other neuronal types
— glutamatergic, cholinergic, tryptaminergic,
GABAergic, noradrenergic, adrenergic —
show “grievous cytoskeletal damage,” according
to Braak and Braak. [4]
The characteristic pattern of nerve cell
destruction in SN neurons appears to be linked
to abnormalities that develop in the cytoskeleton.
The pathognostic Lewy bodies and Lewy
neurites are composed mainly of abnormal
cytoskeletal neurofilament proteins. [3, 4] Neurons
afflicted with Lewy formations remain viable
for a relatively long period, but are functionally
compromised and die prematurely. As a
rule, projection neurons with long axons are
more vulnerable than local circuit and projection
neurons with short axons, which tend to
be spared. [4]
Current Management of Parkinson’s Disease
Parkinsonism is a term broadly applied
to the subject presenting with movement impaired
by rigidity, tremor, or extreme slowness
(bradykinesia). [1] Parkinsonism can have various
causes (Table 1): occupational exposure
to manganese; [1] trauma to the brain; [9] viral inflammation
of the brain, as with Encephalitis
lethargica which struck five million victims
during the years 1916-1926; [11] and exposures
to toxins still unknown, such as that which has
afflicted citizens of Guam. [12] The diagnosis of
Parkinson’s disease is reserved for cases confirmed
by selective cell death in the SN.
Currently, PD is managed mainly
through dopamine replacement therapy —
pharmaceutical agents aimed at replacing
dopamine in the brain or mimicking its actions
at dopamine receptors. [9] Most commonly used
is the dopamine precursor levodopa in combination
with carbidopa (Sinemet® and Sinemet
CR). The vast majority of patients experience
benefits initially, but rarely do the benefits
persist. Typically, after 2–5 years on levodopa
drugs the patient’s responses become erratic.
Nausea is a constant threat, and dyskinesias
develop that feature excessive and uncontrollable
movements. Other adverse effects develop:
mental confusion, “freezing” and inability
to move, dystonia, low blood pressure episodes,
sleep disturbances, and hallucinations. [1, 9]
Adverse side effects usually pose a
major ongoing challenge to the PD patient. [10]
For example, the combined effects of the disease
and the drugs used to treat it produce sleep
problems in an estimated 70 percent of patients
and daytime hallucinations in about 30 percent.
Levodopa is usually effective for motor
symptoms at the beginning, but over time tends
to cause motor fluctuations, dyskinesias, and
other adverse side effects. These can become
so disabling that surgical treatment becomes
the only apparent option for restoring any quality
of life. [13]
Other drugs used for PD symptom
management include amantadine
(Symmetrel®), selegiline (Eldepryl®,
deprenyl), dopamine agonists (bromocriptine,
pergolide, pramipexole, ropinirole), and several
anticholinergic drugs. All these have major
adverse effects and generally are less effective
than Sinemet® in suppressing symptoms.
Tolcapone, an inhibitor of COMT (catechol-
O-methyltransferase, the enzyme which
normally inactivates dopamine), became available
in 1998. It caused several deaths from liver
failure. [1] Another COMT inhibitor —
entacapone — was released in 1999 which was
not liver-toxic but still caused dyskinesias,
nausea, diarrhea, abdominal pain, and urine
discoloration. [1]
As PD progresses, in addition to the
adverse effects accruing from levodopa
therapy the ever-worsening loss of dopamine
neurons causes progressively crippling damage
to motor control circuits throughout the
brain. [4] The control may shift, so the pathways
that normally inhibit movement come to dominate
those that activate movement. The increasing
desperation of the patient can become the
rationale for risky surgical intervention; for
example, whether to remove inhibitory zones
or to implant electrodes aimed at restoring a
healthy balance of circuits. [13–15]
Surgical destruction of brain tissue was
tried prior to the advent of levodopa therapy,
but produced inconsistent results. More recently,
microelectrodes are being used to detect
signals from individual brain cells, using
these signals as “signposts” to arrive at more
precise locations in the brain. [13] Pallidal and
subthalamic nuclear surgery can improve motor
symptoms and levodopa-induced
dyskinesias, but only unilateral pallidotomy is
acceptable since the bilateral procedure carries
unacceptably high risk. The unilateral procedure,
however, probably the most common
surgery for advanced PD, unfortunately does
not allow for postoperative reduction in
levodopa doses. Postsurgical mortality is 1–1.8 percent, risk of permanent neurological deficit
is about five percent, and benefits tend to
dissipate within 1–4 years.
Deep-brain electrical stimulation
(DBS) by way of surgically implanted electrodes
has the advantages over ablation of being
regulatable and reversible. DBS also has
been bilaterally performed in many patients
with marked benefit and little permanent morbidity. [14, 15] DBS post-operative morbidity and
mortality is less than for ablation, and the
stimulation side effects are relatively mild. [15]
On the negative side, infection may ensue,
mechanical failure occurs in 3–4 percent of
cases, batteries must be replaced at regular
intervals, and the device is expensive. On the
positive side, successful bilateral stimulation
can allow medication dosing to be reduced,
providing the patients a better quality of life.
Although results from randomized studies are
not yet available, surgeons who have done both
ablation and DBS agree that DBS is better for
the patient.
Obviously, the need to broaden the
options for therapy in Parkinson’s disease is
urgent. This urgency compels renewed focus
on the etiology and pathogenesis of the disease.
Deeper scientific understanding of PD would
lead to better preclinical detection and
prophylaxis, validation of biomarkers,
confirmation of genetic and environmental risk
factors, and more prolonged symptom control
with fewer adverse effects.
A Broad Spectrum of Potential Etiologic Factors
As with almost all disease states, a
broad spectrum of both genetic and environmental
factors have been suggested as contributing
to the initiation and progression of PD.
Aging is also implicated, with advanced age
being the single most important risk factor for
the disease.
Role of Aging
Parkinson’s disease is clearly age-dependent.
Several of the neurodegenerative syndromes
documented in the elderly — gait slowing,
for example — resemble those seen in PD
and may be prodromal for the disease. [3] While
the inexorable downhill slide of Parkinson’s
disease is unmistakably a disease process, aging
undoubtedly contributes to PD progression,
perhaps because of its accumulative oxidative
damage and steady decrease of antioxidant
capacity.
Heritability and Genetic Susceptibilities
There appears to be an inherited component
to PD, and a number of family pedigrees
with multiple cases of PD have been
extensively studied. [16, 17] To date, seven loci on
four chromosomes are reliably linked to PD
and/or to neurodegeneration of the parkinsonian
type, not always with the presence of the
Lewy structures. The protein products from
two of these loci are linked to nerve cell damage
in other neurodegenerative conditions.
Alpha-synuclein, localized to chromosome 4,
is a major component of the Lewy bodies, not
just in PD but also in dementia with Lewy bodies
and in the Lewy body variant of
Alzheimer’s disease. [16] Non-familial PD subjects
carrying a specific alpha-synuclein allele
and ApoE4, a high-risk allele for Alzheimer’s,
have a 13–fold increased risk of developing PD.
Parkin, localized to chromosome 6, causes
early-onset parkinsonism without the Lewy
bodies that define PD. [16] Most PD cases, however,
do not have other affected family members
and have no apparent familial contribution.
One particularly good test system with
which to quantify disease heritability is a twin
study, in which disease frequency is compared
between cohorts of identical twins and fraternal
twins. If genetic factors are important, concordance
in monozygous (MZ) twins, who are
100–percent genetically identical, will be
greater than in dizygous twins, who are only
50–percent genetically identical. Tanner and a
team of associates did such a twin study. [18]
Drawing from the U.S. World War II
Veteran Twins Registry, Tanner’s group compiled
a pool of 19,842 white male twins. After
exhaustive screenings and a series of in-depth
diagnostic examinations, they confirmed 193
twins with PD among 172 twin pairs. They
confirmed mono- vs. di-zygosity using polymerase
chain reaction analysis of DNA. For
the entire sample as a whole, with average age
of onset of 64.5 years, there was no significantly
greater concordance of the disease between
identical twins than between fraternal
twins, indicating no genetic linkage to PD. In
contrast, for those who developed the disease
earlier than age 50, further data analysis disclosed
there was greater genetic concordance
in the MZ twins. For this group, which represents
10–15 percent of the total PD cases, genetic
linkage was not ruled out. [18]
With the key studies now done, the
preponderance of the evidence indicates the
general PD population has no more than a mild
genetic contribution. Still, overall absence of
defined heritability does not necessarily rule
out subpopulations with higher heritability, or
subtle genetically-conditioned vulnerabilities.
Rohan de Silva et al [16] and Reiss et al [17] discuss
how various specific gene mutations and
deletions might potentially contribute to PD.
The genes involved could act with varying
degrees of penetrance, or polygenically
contribute to disease vulnerability with no
single gene being wholly responsible. Though
better designed and more definitive than those
that preceded it, the outcome of the Tanner
study still leaves open possibilities in these
areas. For early-onset PD, the cumulative
evidence is consistent with a strong heritability
component (at least in white males, the only
group studied to date). [7, 16, 17]
Some individuals with PD have impaired
liver detoxification. The P450 IID6 enzyme,
which was characterized based on its
capacity to metabolize debrisoquine, was
found to be dysfunctional more frequently in
PD subjects than in non-PD controls.7 Of the
PD subjects, those with very early onset (<
age 40) were most likely to have this problem.
The gene for P450 IID6 was localized to
chromosome 22, and efforts are underway to
develop it into a biomarker for early-onset PD,
but this may not prove practical. Conducting
such assays in vivo is expensive and laborious,
and in the studies some of the medications
being taken for PD may have complicated
the outcomes.
Interestingly, P450 IID6 is present in
the nigrostriatal system and the notorious parkinsonian
toxin, 1-methyl, 4-phenyl, 1,2,3,6-
tetrahydropyridine (MPTP) is a substrate for
this complex. [7] MPTP came to the forefront of
PD research in 1982, when drug addicts in
northern California began to develop severe
parkinsonism after intravenous injection of a
synthetic heroin that was contaminated with
MPTP as a byproduct of its synthesis. [19]
Environmental Contributors, Especially Toxins
The MPTP poisonings led to a serendipitous
finding: that the symptoms resulting
from exposure to MPTP very closely matched
the many features of PD. [19–21] This shifted the
focus toward environmental factors as potential
PD initiators or contributors. As the search
progresses, a single toxic cause remains elusive
but a role for environmental factors seems
almost certain.
Whatever the exact degree of
contribution from environmental toxins,
currently the cumulative evidence suggests PD
is a multifactorial oxidative disease. The main
causal, oxidative contributors indicted to date
are:
(1) measurable amplification of the
endogenous oxidative load by constitutive
impairments of mitochondrial energy
transformations;
(2) innate vulnerability of the
brain’s substantia nigra region to oxidative
challenge; and
(3) initiation or promotion by
toxic exposure(s) that further deplete
antioxidants.
These factors combine to initiate
a downhill course for the neurons of the SN
and elsewhere in the brain, the end result of
which appears to be a slow-acting yet longterm
progressing, inflammatory process. This
eventually results in the micro-anatomic
degeneration and clinical symptomatologies of
Parkinson’s disease.
Mitochondrial Energetics Generate Endogenous Oxidative Burden
All the body’s cells, like oxygenutilizing
cells anywhere, generate life energy
and simultaneously generate oxygen free
radicals (oxyradicals). The resultant oxidative
burden is an obligatory, unavoidable byproduct
of oxygen-based (aerobic) respiration. Very
early in the progression of life, the adoption
of oxygen to drive energetics produced a
higher energy yield from food molecules, but
with a “downside.” This downside was the
production of oxyradicals, so highly reactive
they have the potential to destroy the living
system. [22] Antioxidant defenses developed,
which curb the toxic threat from oxyradicals
and help keep them integrated with the myriad
pathways of healthy metabolism. [23] The major
cellular “hot spots,” where the bulk of
oxyradicals are produced and antioxidant
defenses are normally most challenged, are the
semi-independent organelles called
mitochondria.
Present in all human cells, the mitochondria
are the cells’ energy powerhouses
since they generate the vast bulk of the ATP
that drives life processes. [23] The mitochondria
have their own DNA and manage the oxidative
phosphorylation process (“oxphos”). In
this process carbon-carbon double bonds are
split to create pairs of energized electrons,
whose electronic energy is then converted into
the chemical bond energy of ATP. As the mitochondria
utilize 90 percent or more of the
cells’ available oxygen to make ATP, they also
generate 90 percent or more of the oxyradicals
that make up the endogenous oxidative burden. [24]
The mitochondrial electron transfer
complexes use highly electrophilic molecular
oxygen to create an electronic potential gradient
which “pulls” electrons through a series
of five cytochrome-protein complexes. The
complexes sequentially extract the electrons’
energy, converting it to ATP (Figure 2); at the
end the electrons are combined with hydrogen
and oxygen to make water. However, during
the transfers single electrons escape enzymatic
control; these combine with oxygen to
create oxygen free radicals, at a rate of around
two percent of all oxygen consumed. To protect
against destruction by this flux of
oxyradicals, the mitochondria have sophisticated
antioxidant defenses; but inevitably a few
oxyradicals slip through to attack
biomolecules. In PD this electron leakage is
abnormally accentuated. [25]
Flawed Energetics Characterizes Parkinson’s Disease
Parkinson’s disease subjects have been
found to have abnormalities of oxidative phosphorylation
that impair their mitochondrial
energy generation and almost surely increase
their endogenous oxidative burden. Research
into mitochondrial energetics in PD was
sparked by the observation that the notorious
MPTP targets the mitochondria and inhibits
their energetic function. [25] It is now clear that
PD patients have mitochondrial energetic impairment
which closely resembles that attributable
to MPTP but is apparently constitutive
in origin. [26–29]
The oxidative phosphorylation
complexes are aggregates of enzymes,
functionally linked and distributed in groups
throughout the inner membranes of the
mitochondria (Figure 2). The complexes I, II,
III, IV, and V occur in spatial sequences that
optimize electron transfer efficiency while
minimizing the possibilities for single-electron
“leakage” to oxygen that would generate
oxyradicals. [25] The system is finely balanced:
damage to any one complex both reduces ATP
yield and worsens the inevitable leakage of
oxyradicals from the system.
Schapira and coworkers8 were the first
to report that mitochondrial complex I activity
was selectively reduced in the SN of patients
with PD, and subsequently this was confirmed
by others. [26–29] Haas et al [26] found this
abnormality was not confined to the brain:
using platelets purified from early-stage patients
not on medication for PD, they documented
abnormalities of complex I and possibly
also complexes II and III in their mitochondria.
The complex I impairment ranged from
16–54 percent, and was worse in more advanced
cases of the disease. Complex I abnormalities
were also described from non-nigral
brain areas, muscle, and fibroblasts of PD subjects,
but whether these really exist is still being
debated. [25, 27]
In metabolically extreme situations, as
from exposure to hypoxia, hyperoxia, or metabolic
poisons, the mitochondrial complexes
can be shut down and the cell soon dies. [25]
Complex I is especially sensitive to MPTP, [21]
and, as mentioned above, is the same complex
found to be hypofunctional in PD patients. [8, 26, 27]
Complex I (NADH:ubiquinone oxidoreductase)
serves as the principal entry point for
electrons into the enzymatic transport chain.
Like most other mitochondrial proteins, complex
I is genetically coded for by the ringshaped
DNA of the mitochondrion. To help
determine whether complex I is genetically
abnormal, Swerdlow and colleagues [27] devised
an experiment using “cybrids.”
Swerdlow’s group first produced a
cultured line of human neuroblastoma cells
that contained no mitochondrial DNA. Then
they repopulated these cells with mitochondria
prepared from the platelets of PD patients or
healthy control subjects. This created matched
populations of cybrids in which the cytoplasm
was commonly shared, but the mitochondrial
DNA came either from PD mitochondria or
from non-PD (control) mitochondria. Using
this elegant means for comparison, they could
confirm that the PD mitochondria were at least
20–percent less efficient in complex I activity,
produced higher levels of oxygen free radicals,
and rendered their host cells more susceptible
to MPTP-induced cell death. They suggested
the complex I defect was based in the
mitochondrial DNA of the PD patient. Such
gene damage could come from parental
inheritance or from oxidative attack upon the
mitochondria. Whatever the primary source of
the mitochondrial genic damage, enhanced
complex I vulnerability (and perhaps damage
to other complexes [28]) helps explain why some
individuals develop PD following toxin
exposure, while others do not.
Following on MPTP’s emergence in
1982, intensive study of its action mechanisms
rendered it an experimental model for exogenous
oxidant toxins and yielded valuable insights
on PD. [19–21, 25, 28, 29] Technically, MPTP is
a “protoxin.” It is not toxic by itself but once
it enters the brain becomes biotransformed to
the toxic product MPP+ (1-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium)
by the enzyme monoamine oxidase
B (MAO-B). [19, 20] MPP+ is a highly reactive
free radical oxidant that is selectively taken
up by the dopamine neurons of the substantia
nigra, then once inside the neurons is selectively
taken up by their mitochondria. [21] Within
the mitochondrion MPP+ readily inhibits complex
I of the oxphos apparatus; [25] also inhibited
may be the enzyme alpha-ketoglutarate
dehydrogenase, which is located near complex
I and also involved in energetics. [28, 29]
MPP+ infiltration of the cells’
mitochondria, consequent to MPTP exposure,
creates an alarming cellular scenario: extreme
impairment of mitochondrial energy
production for the cell, accompanied by
amplification of oxygen radical production.
Most likely a vicious cycle develops, wherein
lowered energy production by the
mitochondria heightens oxyradical formation,
which causes oxidative damage, further
lowering energy production until the cell dies.
In an afflicted human progressing toward
clinical expression of Parkinson’s disease, this
process takes years; MPTP produces
parkinsonian symptoms within just days.
Substantia Nigra Vulnerable to Oxidative Stress
Oxidative stress exists when the oxidative
burden on a living system is so great
that effective antioxidant defenses cannot be
maintained. [22, 23] Intensified oxidative burden —
arising from increased endogenous production
of oxyradicals and/or from excessive exposure
to exogenous oxidative agents — threatens to
shift the finely balanced oxidation-reduction
state away from reduction and towards oxidation.
If sufficiently sustained, oxidative stress
can impose lasting oxidative imbalance on the
living system, hastening its demise. [30]
The brain carries a high endogenous
oxidative burden. First, by having myelin
sheaths the neurons are particularly enriched
in polyunsaturated lipids. Due to their high
density of carbon-carbon double bonds, these
lipids are prime targets for oxidative attack. [22]
Second, the brain consumes a disproportionately
high share of the body’s oxygen intake,
creating a correspondingly high flux of endogenous
oxyradical formation. Third, the activities
of the antioxidant enzymes catalase and
peroxidase are abnormally low in the brain.
The superoxide dismutase enzymes are active,
acquiring superoxide oxyradical as it leaks out
of the mitochondrial complexes and converting
it to hydrogen peroxide (H2O2). But in the
virtual absence of catalase and peroxidase,
which normally would detoxify these peroxide
products, the burden for detoxifying H2O2
is shunted onto the glutathione peroxidase
enzyme. This enzyme uses glutathione (GSH)
as its essential cofactor, and when it is
adaptively induced the brain’s GSH reserves
are likely rendered more prone to depletion
from oxidative attack. [30] Multiple studies confirm
that the brain’s substantia nigra region is
abnormally depleted of GSH in PD patients. [31–34]
The substantia nigra’s unique biochemistry
renders it even more vulnerable to
oxidative stress than the brain as a whole. Its
unique biochemical features are:
A high content of dopamine, consequent
to the high density of dopaminergic
neurons in the SN. Dopamine has a strong tendency
to spontaneously break down into oxidant
metabolites by “auto-oxidation;” most
reactive among these auto-metabolites are 6-
hydroxydopamine quinone and dopamine
aminochrome. [35] Dopamine’s oxidative breakdown
also can be accelerated by free (ionized)
iron or by other redox-active elements such as
copper, zinc, or manganese. [37]
An extremely high content of iron,
higher even than in the liver, [34, 36, 37] and most
concentrated in the SN’s zona compacta which
becomes most damaged in PD. [36] It has been
suggested that when iron reaches such high
concentrations in cells it can escape buffer control
by ferritin and the other iron-binding proteins. [37] It could then (via the Fenton reaction)
catalytically convert hydrogen peroxide to
generate the highly reactive hydroxyl radical,
which can damage DNA and all other classes
of biomolecules. [22, 35, 36] Substantia nigra iron
levels measure even higher in patients with
advanced disease. [36]
The protein alpha-synuclein, normally
a presynaptic constituent, in its aggregated
form is a prominent component of the Lewy
aggregates that develop in the SN of
Parkinson’s patients. [4] Experimentally, ionized
iron, in addition to copper and zinc, will catalyze
its transformation into aggregates. [38] Copper
is sometimes elevated in the cerebrospinal
fluid of advanced PD patients, but its in vivo
relationship (if any) with alpha-synuclein aggregation
is not yet apparent.
High activities of the two monoamine
oxidase enzymes (MAO-A and B),
which normally function to degrade dopamine
to products that include hydrogen peroxide.
MAO-B activity increases with aging. [39]
High content of melanin (dopamine-
melanin). [37, 38] This complex macromolecular
material can be formed from the auto-oxidation
of dopamine. Its normal function appears
to be the scavenging of free radicals. But
when infiltrated with high levels of ionized
iron, it can drive the Fenton reaction and exacerbate
the conversion of endogenous hydrogen
peroxide to the potent hydroxyl radical. [37]
The population of melanin-enriched, dopaminergic
neurons found in the SN’s zona compacta
are the worst affected in PD. Melanin
within the SN could act as a support matrix
upon which ionized iron would catalyze
oxyradical generation from available hydrogen
peroxide or from neuromelanin itself. [39]
Low GSH content relative to other
brain areas. [32–34, 37] In animal and cell-level experiments,
depletion of nigrostriatal GSH enhanced
sensitivity to oxidants and to complex
I impairment. GSH depletion seemingly occurs
early in the disease pathogenesis, so it
may be a central factor in the process. [37, 40]
Techniques are available to detect and
quantify oxidative stress in vivo. Table 2 shows
that many of the universally accepted oxidative
stress indicators are significantly abnormal
in the SN of the Parkinson’s patient.
The substantia nigra, and particularly
its zona compacta, carries so many pro-oxidant
biochemical risk factors it could well be
an oxidative “accident waiting to happen.” One
such accident could be Parkinson’s disease,
provoked by oxidant insult from outside the
SN. [40]
Glutathione Depletion Pivotal in Parkinson’s Disease
Environmental agents implicated in the
etiology of PD include pesticides, oxidant transition
and heavy metals (iron, copper, zinc,
manganese, mercury, lead, aluminum), and
certain food-borne toxic agents, all of which
can readily be categorized as oxidative stressor
agents. What all these diverse agents have
in common is their capacity to challenge the
fragile antioxidant status of the SN and deplete
its GSH content. The evidence strongly
suggests glutathione depletion is the pivotal
event in Parkinson’s etiology.
Glutathione is a potent molecular antioxidant,
a conjugation cofactor for the liver
P450 system, and an essential cofactor for the
glutathione peroxidase family of antioxidant
enzymes. [23, 33, 37] GSH also plays higher-level
roles in metabolism: anti-inflammatory, antitoxin,
and metabolic regulator. [31] Its levels are
homeostatically maintained inside the living
cell, where the self-adjusting mechanisms for
maintaining GSH are numerous. GSH levels
may well be a life gauge: that is, for as long as
its levels are maintained the living cell is
healthy and functional, and once it is severely
depleted the cell is destined to die. [31, 45]
Evidence is growing that GSH depletion
contributes to neurodegenerative diseases.
In numerous animal models of GSH depletion,
the blockage at birth of the animal’s capacity
for GSH synthesis distorts brain development.
In young or adult animals, GSH blockage results
in neuronal pathology. Specific clinical
evidence in Parkinson’s disease also points to
GSH depletion as the common thread. Bains
and Shaw [45] gathered together the various
threads and assembled them into the model
summarized in Figure 3.
The features of this model most relevant
to PD are GSH degradation in the SN,
and its overlap with the presence of oxidative
stressors. A source of oxidative stress need not
be just a toxin — it can be insufficiency of
dietary antioxidants or mineral enzyme cofactors,
impairment of antioxidant enzyme synthesis,
or the overall decline of antioxidant
defense capacity with advancing age. Furthermore,
the negative synergy between GSH
depletion and oxidative stress certainly need
not result only in PD. This GSH-depletion
model predicts the clustering of
neurodegenerative disease symptoms sometimes
clinically observed in the same individual,
including Alzheimer’s disease, amyotrophic
lateral sclerosis (ALS), and PD.
The Bains and Shaw model of pathologic
GSH depletion also predicts that populations
most at risk for developing diseases
such as PD, Alzheimer’s, and ALS are those
at the low end of the overall range for GSH. [45]
They propose that “low-glutathione” individuals
exist in the population, “primed” for
initiation of PD or other neurodegenerative
progression. Glutathione depletion could arise
in various ways, including genetic propensity,
poor diet, pharmaceutical treatment (as
with acetaminophen use), or as a function of
age. An Italian clinical team reported that intravenous
administration of GSH to newlydiagnosed
PD patients resulted in marked improvement
in motor ability in nine patients. [46]
These findings were substantiated by
Perlmutter in the United States. [2]
Potential Exogenous Triggers for Parkinson’s
In its most healthy state the substantia
nigra is more vulnerable to oxidative attack
than probably any other brain region. Its
unique co-enrichments with dopamine,
monoamine oxidases, iron, and melanin all
contribute to this excessive degree of vulnerability.
The SN also carries the mitochondrial
complex I defect, which lowers energy production
and intensifies endogenous oxygen free
radical production. Then there is the aging factor:
as the decades pass, antioxidant defenses
tend to become less competent. Conceivably
the SN decompensates only from endogenous
oxidative stress, but the evidence argues for an
additional exogenous event or insult. What,
then, is the trigger that finally sets in motion
the SN’s degenerative breakdown?
This question cannot be satisfactorily
answered, but clues do exist. One clue comes
from a mixed ALS-parkinsonism dementia
complex specific to the island of Guam. [12, 47] An
exogenous toxic influence is known to be involved,
but no single agent has been confirmed
beyond doubt. Prime candidates are the DNA
poison cycasin from the false sago palm
(Cycas circinalis), [47] or two excitotoxins that
also come from this palm. In addition, there is
the high aluminum content of the soil, and zinc
contamination of food prepared from this
palm. [12] Some experts speculate that combinations
of these factors could be acting in synergy.
Another food-borne category of potential
neurotoxins is the ß-carbolines (harman,
norharman, TaClo) [48] and the
tetrahydroisoquinolines (TIQ), which are
structurally similar to MPP+. [40] Some of these
have been isolated from the brain, cerebrospinal
fluid, and plasma of PD patients. They also
are consumed in foods such as cheese, cocoa,
bananas, milk, eggs, and beef, and they cross
the blood-brain barrier. [29] The ß-carboline
TaClo can be endogenously formed from
tryptamine, following exposure to chloral or
trichloroethylene, and the TIQs can be formed
in the brain from catecholamine condensation
with aldehydes. [40] Although they are described
as “weak neurotoxins,” the long-term effects
of chronic exposure have not been well explored.
Heavy metals and transition metals that
accumulate at or near the SN are potential triggers
for PD. Occupational exposure to iron,
aluminum, or manganese for more than 30
years greatly increases the risk of acquiring
PD (odds ratio 13.64, p < 0.05); [49, 50] manganese
overexposures often manifest as parkinsonism.
Iron, though essential for life, is highly
redox-active and chronically high levels could
escape protein buffering and promote
oxyradical generation. [35]
Acting to some degree like iron, which
is highly oxidative, mercury, lead, zinc, and
copper all have oxidant activity. All are capable
of intensifying oxyradical generation in vivo
and depleting tissue antioxidant stores. Mercury
crosses the blood-brain barrier, and a
case-control study conducted in Singapore has
linked body burden of this element to the diagnosis
of PD. [51]
Pesticides have now become highly
suspect as potential Parkinson’s disease triggers. [52, 53] A connection was long suspected between
PD and rural living, including the drinking
of contaminated well water or exposures
to pesticides or herbicides, as well as industrial
exposures to chemicals and heavy metals. [54] Cases have been reported of workers with
exposure to multiple pesticides and early-onset
PD. [50] Earlier, epidemiological studies suggested
an etiological relationship between PD
and pesticide exposure; dieldrin which is a
mitochondrial poison was specifically implicated. [53] A more recently completed study
added further likelihood to the possibility that
pesticides trigger PD. [55]
Dr. Lorene Nelson, a neuroepidemiologist
at Stanford University School
of Medicine in Palo Alto, California, and
colleagues did a study of 496 persons
diagnosed with PD and compared them with
541 matched controls. [55] Using structured
interviews, they determined that home
exposure to insecticides and herbicides was
associated with increased risk of PD.
Fungicide exposure did not emerge as
statistically significant. Upon further analysis,
in-home insecticide exposure for nongardeners
was found to pose higher risk (twice
normal) than outside gardening with herbicides
(1.7x) or insecticides (1.5x).
Parkinson’s Initiation May Not Require Extended Exposure
Parkinson’s disease is deceptively
complex, but as a result of the MPTP experience
real progress has been made toward understanding
the mechanisms operative in the
disease. A few high-dose exposures to MPTP
by the intravenous route can trigger parkinsonian
symptoms that very closely resemble
PD. [19, 20] MPTP’s startling toxicity is an exaggerated
though faithful model for PD wherein,
due to molecular abnormalities, the mitochondria
become targeted by an exogenous oxidant
toxin. This compromises energy supply, magnifies
oxidative load thus depleting antioxidant
resources, and destroys the vulnerable substantia
nigra.
Following their initial report on MPTP
toxicity, [19] Langston and collaborators followed
the fates of a small number of more severely
affected MPTP victims. [20] After seven years,
they used positron emission tomography
(PET) imaging with labeled fluorodopa to assess
striatal dopamine function in 10 subjects
originally exposed to MPTP for very short
periods. [56] The PET findings closely matched
the clinical records and indicated nigrostriatal
function in these subjects was declining more
rapidly than in normal aging.
As the years went by, Langston’s group
continued long-term patient tracking, and obtained
samples from the brains of three individuals
not long after death. [20] They found convincing
evidence that, following an initial brief
period of MPTP exposure years previous,
some of the victims had progressed to bona
fide Parkinson’s disease. All three had originally
injected MPTP for no more than a week
in 1982, and they died 3, 12, and 16 years after
the initial exposure. At death all had active
neuronal degeneration and a type of reactive
histopathology in the SN that strikingly resembled
the pattern established for PD, though
they had not used MPTP since their initial exposure.
These findings from Langston can be
taken to suggest that a transient toxic exposure
— even a relatively short, one-week
period of exposure to MPTP — initiated a
slowly progressive brain pathology that continued
to worsen for as long as 16 years until
the death of the patient. They reported their
findings were indicative of “active, ongoing
nerve cell loss,” suggesting that, “a time-limited
insult to the nigrostriatal system can set
in motion a self-perpetuating process of
neurodegeneration.” [20] They suggested three
possible mechanisms to explain these dramatic
findings: (1) oxidative stress; (2) treatment of
the subjects’ initial parkinsonian symptoms
with levodopa, which could enhance dopamine
production in overworked and
hypofunctional SN neurons and further promote
dopamine oxidation; and (3) a self-perpetuating
inflammatory process. None of these
mechanisms excludes the others; on the contrary,
the available findings suggest all three
are simultaneously active in the Parkinson’s
brain. Parkinson’s disease appears to be a
multifactorial disease, initiated and probably
driven by oxidative factors.
This multifactorial, oxidative stress
model for Parkinson’s disease is consistent
with the considerable body of clinical data on
PD. It carries a sobering implication: the thousands
of oxidant chemicals that contaminate
the air, water, soil, and food could act singly
or in combination to trigger disease progression.
Foods depleted of antioxidants, oxidant
pharmaceuticals, or lifestyle factors that raise
oxidative load (smoking, drinking, chronic
virus load) could all contribute. If the toxic
exposure is at relatively low concentration but
sustained over time, the process can be set into
motion but take years or decades to clinically
manifest. The aging process also may come
into play: a younger individual may be comparatively
resistant to toxic triggers unless
genetically susceptible, whereas an older person
might be rendered comparatively defenseless
against oxidant attack.
The pattern of cell breakdown and inflammation
evident in the PD brain is unique
to PD. It exhibits some of the predictable features
of nerve tissue reaction to damage, including
microglial activation [57, 58] and increases
in cytokines such as transforming growth factor-
beta (TGF-ß-1) and tumor necrosis factoralpha
(TNF-±). [59] Atypical features include a
conspicuous absence of astrocytic activation [60]
and no evidence of apoptotic cell death. [58] Just
how this unique mix of processes combine to
create the inexorable progression of brain degeneration
still remains to be deciphered. Until
more definitive evidence emerges, the strategy
for attempted prophylaxis of PD, and for
its long-term medical management, must be
fully integrative and take into account all possible
contributory factors.
L-Dopa Likely Contributes to Disease Progression
The standard medical therapy for PD
continues to be levodopa, usually with
carbidopa added to prolong its retention
(Sinemet, Sinemet CR). Levodopa is the most
immediate biochemical precursor to dopamine,
the neurotransmitter depleted due to
breakdown of the substantia nigra. This
therapy does not ameliorate the underlying
progressive loss of dopamine-producing neurons
and over the long term may contribute to
PD progression.
Parkinson’s patients treated with
levodopa sometimes develop elevated plasma
homocysteine (HCy). [61] Hyperhomocysteinemia
is a major risk factor for vascular
disease. [62] SAMe (s-adenosyl methionine, a
methyl-activated metabolite of methionine) is
a key metabolic contributor to the recycling
of HCy. [60] Levodopa was found to deplete
SAMe from the central nervous system of human
subjects, and perhaps poses a threat to
the homeostatic regulation of homocysteine. [63]
Muller and colleagues [64] measured
plasma HCy in Parkinson’s patients treated
with levodopa, and compared them with
Parkinson’s subjects not previously treated,
and healthy controls. HCy levels were almost
twice as high in the levodopa-treated PD patients
as compared with the non-treated group
and the healthy group (p < 0.001 and p < 0.002,
respectively); plasma HCy of the non-treated
Parkinson’s patients did not significantly differ
from the healthy participants. Dangerously
elevated plasma HCy may provide a key to
the increased mortality attributed to vascular
disease in patients with PD. [65] These findings
also suggest PD patients taking levodopa might
benefit from concomitant supplementation
with folate and vitamin B12, both of which
help recycle HCy.
Nutrient Deficiencies in Parkinson's Disease
The brain uses the same nutrients that other organs use; therefore,
all nutrient classes can be useful to Parkinson's patients. Many nutrients
have been found deficient in PD, and others are likely to be deficient
at some point during disease progression. [66]
Certain individual amino acids are precursors to brain neurotransmitters
and significantly ameliorate symptoms when given as dietary supplements.
Tyrosine, phenylalanine, and tryptophan can all be blocked from absorption
by levodopa, thereby becoming deficient. L-tyrosine is a direct precursor
to levodopa, which is then converted to dopa-mine. Deficiency may develop
due to reduced intake from meat, dairy and eggs, or to diminished enzymatic
conversion from phenylalanine. PD patients also may have impaired capacity
to utilize L-tyrosine, [67] even though it
may be normally absorbed. [68] In 1989, Lemoine
and collaborators reported L-tyrosine gave better clinical results and
had many fewer side effects than levodopa when tested in a small group
of patients. [66] L-tyrosine should not be
taken at the same time of day as levodopa, since it competes for absorption.
D-phenylalanine is another amino acid that should not be taken with
levodopa. [66] The D-form (DPA specifically;
not the L-form) was reported to improve rigidity, walking, speech difficulties,
and psychic depression, but not tremor. [69]
L-tryptophan also competes with levodopa for absorption. [66]
Parkinson's disease patients treated with levodopa can manifest low serum
tryptophan, [70] and L-tryptophan therapy
often helps them break through their depression. [71]
In a placebo-controlled study, L-tryptophan produced improvements in functional
ability beyond those afforded by levodopa, and also significantly improved
mood and drive. [72] Given with niacin and
pyridoxine, L-tryptophan was useful in ameliorating the motor complications
from long-term levodopa therapy. [66]
L-methionine is an essential amino acid, and its supplementation may
benefit PD. In one study, 15 patients who had maximal improvement from
standard medications were increased gradually from 1 g/day to 5 g/day. [73]
Ten of the 15 improved on all measures except tremor and drooling.
A number of B vitamins may be deficient in PD patients. In one reported
case, deficiency of folic acid due to an inborn error of folate metabolism
generated parkinsonian symptoms which included progressive hypokinesia,
tremor, rigidity, and "pill-rolling," with deficiency of dopamine
though SN degeneration was not found at autopsy. [74]
Niacin can become deficient in patients treated with levodopa, especially
if it is given with carbidopa or other decarboxylase inhibitors. [75]
Supplementation with niacin may prolong elevated brain levodopa levels. [76]
In the case of vitamin B6, treatment with levodopa alone often raises
the levels of this vitamin, so co-supplementation is contraindicated. [77]
By contrast, treatment with the commonly prescribed levodopa-carbidopa
combination may provoke a marginal B6 deficiency, and supplementation with
B6 can benefit at least some of these patients. [78,79]
Vitamin B6 can be injected intraspinally with thiamine, for partial symptomatic
relief. [66]
Vitamin C (ascorbic acid) is sometimes found decreased in Parkinson's
brains. [34] One double-blind trial in PD
found supplementation produced a modest improvement in functional performance. [66]
In 1975, Sacks and Simpson reported 4 g/day ascorbic acid lessened nausea
and other levodopa side effects in the case of a 62–year-old man. [80]
When alternated between ascorbic acid and placebo (citric acid) under double-blind
conditions, his patterns of improvement correlated with the periods of
receiving ascorbic acid.
Vitamin E supplementation may be important for PD patients. A 1988 survey
of the dietary habits of PD patients prior to the age of 40 revealed that
intakes of nuts, oils, and plums relatively high in vitamin E were associated
with lowered risk of PD. [66] Previous clinical
studies using high doses of encapsulated vitamin E suggested this vitamin
has an important role in slowing disease progression. [81,82]
Disagreement exists as to whether copper is elevated or deficient in
PD. It was reported elevated in the cerebrospinal fluid of Parkinson's
patients, the degree of elevation being significantly correlated with both
disease severity and rate of progression. [83]
The researcher suggested copper chelation be used therapeutically in these
cases. However, others reported copper in the SN region was abnormally
low. [84,85]
Glutathione becomes more depleted from the SN as the disease progresses
(Figure 4). [34]
N-acetyl cysteine [86] and alpha-lipoic acid
contribute to GSH repletion and are also potent antioxidants. Building
on the highly positive findings from Italy – that intravenous GSH benefited
all nine patients with early PD46 – the pioneering Perlmutter Center offers
intravenous GSH as the most direct means for GSH repletion. [2]
Integrative Management of Parkinson’s Disease
With the evidence steadily accumulating
that Parkinson’s disease is a multifactorial
oxidative disease, there is an urgent need for
integrative management. The allopathic model
that currently dominates Parkinson’s management
is obsolete. The major adverse side effects
of the various drugs currently in use for
the disease, combined with the limitations of
the dopamine replacement strategy, dictate the
need for alternatives.
The classic Parkinson’s progression —
depletion of dopamine-producing neurons
from the substantia nigra, the accumulation of
Lewy bodies — no longer represents the
pathobiology of this disease. A systemic pattern
for PD is evident from the findings of
multiple control circuit damage throughout the
brain; damage along the various
nondopaminergic pathways; peripheral nerve
degeneration; changes in the heart; mitochondrial
insufficiency in brain and probably in
muscle and platelets; and defective P450
detoxification. This broadened understanding
of the disease dictates that its medical management
strategy also be broadened.
Dietary Revision
Decreasing protein intake is useful in
PD. For patients being maintained on
levodopa, high protein intake typical of Western
lifestyle may interfere with levodopa availability
and contribute to episodic loss of symptomatic
control by the drug (the “off-on” phenomenon).
Mena and Cotzias [87] assessed several
levels of protein intakes, and found low
intake (0.5 g/kg/day) improved symptomatic
control throughout the day, while high intake
(10 g/kg/day) exaggerated the off-on pattern.
Seven patients were maintained for up to a year
on low protein intake; six of them maintained
stability with five achieving reductions of
levodopa doses. These early results were confirmed
in subsequent clinical studies. [88–90]
In a double-blind study that compared
low protein intake (50 g/day for men and 40
g/day for women) to high protein intake (80
g/day for men and 70 g/day for women), total
performance scores were significantly improved,
along with tremor, hand agility, and
mobility in the low protein groups. [88] In another
study, modifying meal patterns to eat the majority
of protein in the evening also improved
symptoms. [89] These effects were unrelated to
levodopa absorption or blood levels; perhaps
they are due to some central action of high
dietary protein [88] or variation in the plasma
content of large amino acids. [89]
Reducing caloric and fat intakes is also
important. Logroscino and his collaborators
from Columbia University [91] surveyed the dietary
intakes of 110 PD and 287 non-PD subjects
in New York City. They found PD patients
consumed significantly more calories (p
< 0.0001), their energy-adjusted fat intake was
significantly higher (p < 0.007), and an increasing
intake of animal fats was strongly related
to PD (p < 0.001, odds ratio 5.3, 95% confidence
interval 1.8–15.5). Intakes of antioxidants
were not significantly different between
the groups. These findings are worthy of further
investigation; they are consistent with a
report from England that cardiovascular disease,
also linked to high fat, high calorie diets,
is a more predominant cause of death
among PD patients than the general population. [65]
Caloric reduction has been under scrutiny
for some time as a means to better health
and extended longevity. Considerable personal
discipline is required to adhere to the regimen,
but the scientific findings are very clear: less
calories consumed translates into decreased
free radical production. This is an important
means of lowering endogenous oxidative load,
which is linked to aging progression. [92] Reduction
of lipid calories is also integral to this strategy,
because lipids are the foremost substrates
for peroxidative attack coming from endogenous
oxidative overload. In addition, high
animal fat consumption generally results in a
pro-inflammatory shift in the tissues due to the
preponderance of long-chain omega-6 content. [93] Parkinson’s patients may be well advised
to rebalance their dietary fatty acid sources by
minimizing saturated fats and increasing longchain
omega-3 intakes while reducing their
total caloric intake.
Metal Detoxification
Iron occurs at very high concentrations
in the SN, wherein it normally is bound to ferritin.
Free unbuffered iron likely worsens the
oxidative degenerative process in PD, so periodic
monitoring of iron saturation status is
strongly indicated. Mercury can access the
brain by volatilizing from dental fillings, or
by crossing the blood-brain barrier after becoming
absorbed from foods.
A landmark Singapore study assessed
mercury body burden and linked this to risk
of PD. [51] Fifty-four cases of confirmed PD were
compared to 95 hospital-based controls. PD
was accurately diagnosed, then mercury body
burden indirectly assessed via blood and urine
levels. The relative risk for PD was 8.5x for
blood Hg > 5.9 ng/mL (95% confidence interval
2.2–33.2), and 14.8x for urine Hg > 6.8 ng/
mL (95% confidence interval 3.5–63.7). Dentists
occupationally exposed to mercury in
Singapore averaged above this range, and unexposed
office workers averaged below it. A
“zero load” approach to mercury detoxification
should be the norm, wherein all sources
of mercury exposure are eliminated. Where
mercury contamination is identified, chelation
should be used to eliminate it from the body. [94]
Systemic Glutathione Replacement
With the evidence so overwhelming
that GSH depletion is a central event in
PD, [32, 33, 37] and that the degree of GSH depletion
is worse in advanced disease (Figure 4, lower), effective repletion of GSH must be a
therapeutic priority. Combined intravenous
and oral GSH replacement is safe and well
tolerated, providing ongoing benefit. As oral
GSH precursors both N-acetylcysteine [95] and
alpha-lipoic acid are appropriate. GSH is also
a systemic antioxidant, and its ongoing repletion
may help ameliorate Parkinson’s-related
damage in the heart, liver, muscles, and other
organs.31
Systemic GSH status is also conserved
by bolstering other antioxidant defenses. Especially
noteworthy is high-dose vitamin C,
which provides antioxidant reducing equivalents
known to conserve GSH. Intravenous
ascorbate is a long-established and proven protocol.
96 Taken together with vitamin C, vitamin
E probably also helps delay PD progression.
In 1979, believing oxidative stress
could be a major factor causing neuronal death
in PD, Dr. Stanley Fahn, a neurologist at Columbia
University, began prescribing relatively
high doses of vitamins C (3 g/day) and E
(3,200 IU/day) for his PD patients. [81] As controls
he used data on patients from another
physician, who managed her cases almost
identically to his practice but did not administer
antioxidants. After tracking 21 patients for
a number of years, Fahn’s group found earlyonset
patients (onset <54 years) maintained on
high doses of vitamins C and E were able to
delay levodopa or deprenyl therapy by about
25 months when compared with matched controls.
The later-onset patients (54+ years) were
able to delay the transition to drugs by about
35 months.
Subsequently, a large, multicenter,
double-blind trial was organized. In this
DATATOP study (Deprenyl and Tocopherol
Antioxidant Therapy of Parkinson’s) [82] the
Parkinson’s Study Group evaluated 2,000 IU
of tocopherol and 10 mg of deprenyl per day
in 800 subjects with early PD. Primary
endpoint for the study was disability sufficient
to prompt the decision to begin taking
levodopa. The outcome was that deprenyl
treatment delayed disability for almost nine
months, whereas tocopherol treatment (at 2000
IU/day, lower than Fahn’s study) was not found
to extend delay. This finding should not be
unexpected since nutrient antioxidants often
work together in coordinated biochemical
defense rather than acting singly. [23, 42]
Comprehensive GSH conservation
requires additional oral supplementation
with the entire range of nutrient antioxidants
and antioxidant enzyme mineral co-factors.
However, since PD causes considerable nervous
system damage prior to becoming
symptomatic, antioxidant intervention may
slow further progression but is unlikely to
completely restore function unless implemented
prior to clinical emergence of the
disease. Bains and Shaw suggest a prophylactic
strategy for PD, including screening
at early middle-age to detect individuals with
low-glutathione status. [45]
Essential fatty acids may have benefits
for PD symptoms. Evening primrose
oil, enriched in the anti-inflammatory,
omega-6 gamma-linolenic acid, was reported
to relieve tremor. [98] The omega-3 fatty
acids, especially DHA and EPA in fish oils,
tend to reduce pro-inflammatory cytokine
production in vivo. [99, 100] Due to their high propensity
for oxidation they should be administered
in conjunction with high intakes of
antioxidants. Octacosanol, a long-chain alcohol
found in wheat germ oil, was reported
to be helpful in PD. In a double-blind crossover
trial, 3 of 10 patients significantly improved
and none worsened, with no adverse
side effects experienced. [101] The means by
which this nutrient is benefiting PD is not
immediately evident.
Revitalizing the Parkinson’s Brain
Given the confirmed presence of mitochondrial
energetic abnormalities in the
substantia nigra and elsewhere in the afflicted
brain, [26, 27, 29] nutrients that safely boost
mitochondrial function deserve further exploration
for clinical benefit in PD. Coenzyme
Q10 (ubiquinone; CoQ10) is an electron
acceptor and antioxidant that is a key component
of mitochondrial electron transfer. [24] Two
separate groups reported CoQ10 was significantly
reduced in mitochondria taken from the
brain97 and platelets102 of PD patients (Figure 4, upper). Lowered complex I activity was
strongly correlated with reduced mitochondrial
content of CoQ10.
Shults and collaborators gave three
different oral doses of CoQ10 with vitamin E
daily to 15 PD patients and, after one month,
found complex I activity was increased. [103] At
600 mg/day of CoQ10, complex I activity
doubled to well within the range for healthy
subjects, but small sample sizes precluded attainment
of statistical significance. Since the
mitochondrial CoQ10 balance may be shifted
from the reduced form to the oxidized form in
PD,102 the oxidative drain placed on CoQ10
may be extreme. Additional supplementation
with other mitochondrial support nutrients —
nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NADH),
acetyl-L-carnitine, and phosphatidylserine
(PS) — could diversify energy input to the
mitochondria and further help compensate for
the energetic impairment of PD.
NADH is an electron energy carrier
also indispensable to mitochondrial oxidative
phosphorylation. Birkmayer and collaborators
pioneered its application in PD. [104, 105]
Reasoning that exogenous levodopa downregulates
its own endogenous biosynthesis,
they sought to boost endogenous dopamine
production via the intrinsic pathways. [104] After
finding that NADH did boost dopamine
production in cultured nerve cells, they
conducted an open-label trial on PD patients. [105]
They treated 415 patients intravenously and
470 by the oral route. Using patients as their
own controls, they found similar benefits
between intravenous and oral NADH. For oral
NADH the mean improvement of disability
was 19.8 percent, for intravenous 20.6 percent;
maximum improvement was 55 and 60
percent, respectively, and 36 percent of patients
experienced better than 10–percent benefit.
Subsequently, Kuhn and collaborators
confirmed the benefit of intravenous NADH. [106]
Acetyl-L-carnitine is another mitochondrial
energy carrier, activating transport
into the mitochondria of fatty acids to be used
for energy. This nutrient has energizing, protective,
and trophic effects. [107] In animal experiments
it partially protected the SN against
MPP+ attack, enhanced dopaminergic transmission,
and boosted intrinsic growth factor
production. [107, 108]
Phosphatidylserine is a fundamental
component of the mitochondrial membrane
systems on which are assembled the electron
transfer complexes. It is also a membrane
building block for the synaptic and other neuronal
membranes, and plays a key role in
electro-chemical transmission between the
neurons. Whole-brain imaging with PET
showed PS can markedly enhance energetics
throughout the brain. [107] In an open-label trial
conducted on Parkinson’s patients in Germany,
PS provided greater than 10–percent benefit
to 7 of 12 subjects. [109]
For the busy integrative physician to
consolidate all these approaches into a cohesive
protocol the patient can manage is not an
easy task. One example where this has been
accomplished, and a paramount resource for
integrative management of PD, is the
Perlmutter Health Center in Naples, Florida.
The center’s director, David Perlmutter, MD,
developed the protocol summarized in Table 3.
Upcoming Advances in Integrative Management
The inexorable downhill slide that currently
characterizes Parkinson’s disease can be
ameliorated through early and aggressive intervention
based on an integrative protocol as
exemplified in Table 3. Over the longer term,
medical mastery over this disease awaits advances
in presymptomatic detection and risk
assessment, and in effective brain restoration.
Relevant to these goals, several promising
technological breakthroughs are on the horizon.
Functional Whole-Brain Imaging
Tomographic imaging, both by PET
and SPECT (single photon emission tomography),
offers exciting possibilities for improved
preclinical detection and for assessment
of severity and progression. At the cellular
level in the brain abnormalities are discernible
years before the disease becomes
clinically manifest, but these can only be visualized
microscopically following biopsy.
Functional whole-brain imaging is superior
because it is non-invasive, is becoming increasingly
more available, and can now detect and
quantify dopamine activity in the living brain.
As shown in Figure 5, PET examination using
perfusion with 18F-6-fluorodopa label can effectively
probe decreased dopaminergic function
in the brain (putamen) prior to the appearance
of clinical symptoms. [110, 111]
Following its intravenous administration,
18F-6-fluorodopa is taken up by the
nigrostriatal dopaminergic projections and
decarboxylated to labeled dopamine and
dopamine metabolites. This conversion is imaged
at high resolution using PET. Parkinson’s
patients imaged with PET revealed an average
50–percent loss of dopamine uptake by the
putamen. [111] These data could be compared to
the average 60–80 percent loss of SN zona
compacta cells as quantified from postmortem
sampling. As putamen dopamine levels become
reduced by 90 percent in end-stage PD,
PET shows the nigrostriatal projections are
making virtually no dopamine.
Patients with newly emergent, onesided
PD show by PET a 30–percent dopamine
loss, which matches the 30–percent nigral
cell loss threshold (counted at autopsy) for
symptom emergence. In one case, the technique
detected impaired dopamine metabolism
five years prior to symptom emergence. [111] This
could be extremely valuable for risk assessment
in asymptomatic, at-risk individuals, including
relatives with known PD pedigrees.
Using a new 3-dimensional signal integration
approach, 18F-dopa PET and other
sophisticated whole-brain labeling technology
can now detect reduced dopamine uptake in
all patients with emergent PD, and demonstrate
progressive reductions in the striatal, nigral,
and cingulate levels of dopamine storage as
the disease progresses. [112] PD can now be discriminated
from atypical parkinsonian conditions
with 80–percent accuracy, and non-PD
conditions that feature reduced dopamine metabolism
(striatonigral degeneration, multiple
system atrophy) can also be quantified and
discriminated from PD.
Clinical rating scales are notoriously
imprecise for estimating PD progression. 18Fdopa
PET and related imaging provide a more
objective approach to staging, especially since
disease duration correlates with dopaminergic
decline. The preclinical “window” of dopaminergic
decline prior to symptom emergence
is estimated at 6 ± 3 years using imaging, [113]
whereas estimates from nigral cell counts set
this period at an average 4.5 years. [111]
Neuroprotection
The allopathic approach to PD management
continues to generate new pharmaceuticals,
with the hope of eventually replacing
levodopa with a comparably effective and
less toxic monotherapy. Potential
neuroprotective monotherapies are receiving
high priority. Among the drugs already utilized
for PD management, selegiline and amantadine
appear to have neuroprotective properties. [114] Epidemiologic and clinical evidence
suggests estrogens can be protective in PD, [115]
and PET-controlled comparisons suggest
ropinirole may be protective at early stages. [114]
In a baboon model of PD, nitric oxide synthase
inhibitors blocked the biochemical and
clinical manifestations of MPTP toxicity. [116] In
a rat model of PD, infusions of the opiate receptor
antagonist naloxone partially protected
against SN damage. [117] In cultures of dopaminergic
neurons, the cytokines IL-1ß and IL-6
protected against MPP+ toxicity. [118] Other possible
neuroprotectors for PD are MAO-B inhibitors,
NMDA-receptor antagonists, and
dopamine receptor agonists. [114] A few experts
have suggested a “multi-neuroprotective” strategy
be explored, which hopefully is a prelude
to an eventual “meeting of the minds” on integrative
management of PD.
Neural Transplantation
Attempts to replace dopamine-secreting
neurons within the disease-ravaged substantia
nigra, using transplanted adrenal medullary
or fetal tissue, successfully demonstrated
that such tissue can partially survive
the transplantation process, become established,
and produce dopamine in the new tissue
environment. [119] To date, a few patients have
benefited from this landmark procedure, and
no doubt relative success will improve as the
technique is improved. However, transplanted
dopamine neurons have not been able to fully
replace the needed amounts of dopamine. Future
transplant methodology is likely to place
greater priority on stem cells and/or cultured
cell lines as the tissue source, probably in
closer conjunction with growth factors and
other cell-activating substances.
Stem Cells, Growth Factors, and Gene Therapy
Recent unequivocal demonstration that
stem cells are present in the human brain has
created a new dimension of possibilities for
regeneration of the central nervous system. [120]
This advance is particularly timely for PD,
wherein the earlier limited successes with tissue
transplantation have prepared the ground
for stem cell transplants which should have
better implantation potential. Now growth-promoting
trophic substances, or growth factors
are being employed to improve the possibilities
for survival of the transplant. One factor
already being utilized for this purpose is glial
cell line-derived neurotrophic factor. [121] Vasoactive
intestinal peptide helps nerve cells in
culture to conserve their GSH stores [122] Still,
from the integrative perspective the challenge
is to induce the Parkinson’s brain to endogenously
produce the needed variety and combinations
of growth factors (probably in synergy
with stem cells) that would accomplish
brain revitalization.
In the more distant future, gene therapy
using transplantation of genetically engineered
cells, or direct insertion of genes into a
patient’s brain cells, may prove clinically feasible. [123] Skin and muscle cells genetically altered
to overproduce tyrosine hydroxylase
have been successfully transplanted into
MPTP-parkinsonian monkeys, where they survived,
integrated well into the brain, and produced
dopamine for several months. A great
deal of basic research remains, in order to develop
effective biological vectors for gene insertion,
to ensure inserted genes will continue
to function, and to identify other gene products
than dopamine-synthesizing enzymes
likely to benefit the disease.
Until that time when such heroic, hightech
medicine has become effective, safe, and
financially affordable, the available clinical
experience suggests that PD management can
be markedly improved by following an
integrative medical model. This more rational
and more resourceful medical approach would
embrace non-invasive early detection,
rendering dopamine replacement the last resort
rather than the first; pursue nerve tissue
restoration before surgical intervention; and
win for the Parkinson’s disease patient years
of productive well-being.
Return to ANTIOXIDANTS
Return to PARKINSON'S DISEASE
Since 2–01–2001
|