FROM:
Alternative Medicine Review 2004 (Sep); 9 (3): 318–325 ~ FULL TEXT
Clinical Indications
Depression
A meta-analysis published in 1996 of 23
studies involving over 1,500 individuals found
significantly positive responses to St. John’s wort
based on analysis of the Hamilton Depression
Scale (HAMD) before and after treatment. [19] This
was supported by a more recent meta-analysis
covering clinical trials published through 2000. [20]
In 2000, the Annals of Internal Medicine featured
a two-part overview and critique of newer drug
therapies for depression and dysthymia (a chronic
but milder form of depression), and included St.
John’s wort as a potential treatment for both conditions.
[21, 22] Both reviews conclude St. John’s wort
is more effective than placebo for the treatment
of mild-to-moderate depression and less likely to
cause side effects than commonly prescribed antidepressants.
The 2000 meta-analysis of St. John’s wort
clinical trials lists 16 placebo-controlled trials on
persons with mild-to-moderate depression. [20] These
studies lasted from four to 12 weeks, with doses
varying between 500–900 mg per day. Many of
these trials were completed using 300 mg of the
LI 160 extract (standardized to 0.3% hypericin)
three times daily. [22–25] A significant decrease in
HAMD scores compared to placebo was found in
all trials. Similar results have been noted for an
extract designated ZE 117, [26] as well as standardized
Hypericum extracts with the designations WS
5570 and WS 5572. [27, 28] A phase III clinical trial
utilizing the WS 5570 extract included 375 patients
with major depression, and demonstrated
efficacy and safety superior to placebo when the
extract was dosed at 900 mg daily for six weeks.
This contradicts the results of an earlier well known
study published in JAMA that demonstrated
900–1200 mg St. John’s wort daily was ineffective
in treating severe depression. [29]
At least 12 clinical trials have compared
St. John’s wort directly to prescription antidepressants,
including imipramine, amitriptyline, and
fluoxetine, in persons with mild-to-moderate depression. [20] Earlier clinical trials comparing 900 mg
St. John’s wort daily with imipramine (75 mg
daily) or amitriptyline (75 mg daily) in patients
with mild-to-moderate depression found St. John’s
wort extract (LI 160) to be equally effective in
lowering HAMD scores, with fewer side effects. [30, 31] However, these trials have been criticized
due to the low dose of the standard antidepressant
and lack of a placebo group. One trial comparing
1,050 mg St. John’s wort daily with 100 mg imipramine
daily or placebo did find St. John’s wort
was safe and effective in treating mild-to-moderate
depression. [32] More recently, in a six-week clinical
trial (no placebo arm), 500 mg of the ZE 117
extract was as effective as 150 mg of imipramine. [33]
Two double-blind, randomized trials (with
no placebo arm) suggest 500 mg [34] or 800 mg [35] St.
John’s wort daily is as effective as 20 mg/day of
fluoxetine (Prozac®). Both trials lasted six weeks
and found patients taking St. John’s wort reported
fewer side effects. More recently, two similar trials
demonstrated Hypericum extract to be 83–percent
as effective as fluoxetine therapy in one
study [36] and equally effective (100%) as fluoxetine
therapy in the other. [37] Dosages of Hypericum extract
ranged from 300–500 mg daily; fluoxetine
dosage in both studies was 20 mg daily. In these
two studies adverse effects in the St. John’s wort
group were significantly fewer or equal to
fluoxetine adverse effects.[36, 37]