FROM:
Alternative Medicine Review 2012 (Mar); 17 (1): 36–41 ~ FULL TEXT
Francesco Di Pierro, Giuliana Rapacioli, Tarcisio Ferrara, Stefano Togni
Scientific Director,
Velleja Research s.r.l.,
Via G. Natta, 28, 29010 Pontenure (PC);
f.dipierro@vellejaresearch.com
Echinacea preparations are extensively used for the prevention and the management of the common cold. Despite this
popularity, the clinical studies on Echinacea have produced mixed results, possibly in part because of the poor characterization of the extracts investigated and the use of different species and/or plant parts for the preparations investigated in the various trials. To address this issue, Polinacea®, a highly standardized extract from a well-defined botanical source (roots of Echinacea angustifolia) with a specific phytochemical profile (presence of the complex polysaccharide IDN5405, the phenylethanoid echinacoside, and substantial lack of alkamides) was developed. We have studied whether Polinacea® could enhance the immune response subsequent to the influenza vaccination, and whether the use of this
preparation could translate into a decreased morbidity from influenza. The preliminary results were encouraging, and
suggest that it could be used for improving the immune response to influenza vaccine.
From the Full-Text Article:
Introduction
Preparations from Echinacea are used for the
prevention and the treatment of the common cold;
however, research on efficacy has produced mixed
results. [1] In contrast to a large number of positive
studies conducted according to a non-controlled
design or on a limited population, controlled and
wider-ranging studies have frequently yielded
negative results, or, at best, have only suggested a
positive trend for efficacy. [1] These mixed findings
are not surprising, since the term “Echinacea-based
preparations” encompasses extracts
(1) obtained using varying extraction methods and solvents,
(2) from different Echinacea species, and
(3) from different parts of these plants (e.g., aerial versus underground parts), with therefore marked differences in terms of constituent profiles.
There are three medicinal species of Echinacea
(Echinacea angustifolia D.C., E. purpurea (L.) Moench,
and E. pallida Nutt.). All three of these species can
be found in at least some Echinacea products in the
healthcare market. [2] The roots of these three species
are difficult to distinguish from one another, which
can lead to difficulty in botanical identification. In
part because of confused botanical identification, a
number of preclinical and/or clinical studies on
Echinacea lack botanical traceability and the exact
species of Echinacea used cannot be determined. [1]
This is a critical issue, since substantial phytochemical
differences exist between the three commercial
species of Echinacea, and within each species
between the aerial and underground parts.
Furthermore, the phytochemical profile of all
Echinacea plant parts is characterized by the
presence of compounds that span a wide range of
polarities, and with often opposite, rather than
complementary bioactivity (i.e., some constituents
are water-soluble and are extracted better using
certain methods or solvents, while others are
lipid-soluble and would be poorly extracted using
these same methods or solvents). [3] Generally, the
polar and water-soluble polysaccharides – which
are shared by all three species – have immunostimulating
properties, while the lipophilic alkamides
(isobutylamides) – typical of E. angustifolia
and E. purpurea – have a powerful anti-inflammatory
action, mediated by the activation of the
peripheral cannabinoid receptor. [4] Consequently,
consumption of isobutylamide-rich Echinacea
preparations may contribute to mitigation of the
inflammatory response during an infection in
progress, but might not exert any immuno-stimulating
or preventive action on morbidity. [5] When
this information is combined with their chemical
instability [5] and the current limited knowledge of
their toxicity, it provides a rationale for removing
alkamides from Echinacea extracts intended to be
used exclusively for immuno-stimulating purposes.
From the standpoint of preventing respiratory
tract infections, the most interesting Echinacea
constituents appear to be the polysaccharides and
echinacoside (a polyphenol conjugate). [1] The
polysaccharide fraction of various species of
Echinacea is a powerful activator of the alternative
route of the complement system – a non-specific
defense mechanism – and of cytokines capable of
triggering macrophage activation. [1] These effects
increase objective immunological parameters, like
the number of T cells, the plasma levels of neutrophils,
the macrophage phagocytosis index, as well
as the activity of natural killer cells. [1] Echinacoside
is also a weak antibacterial agent that can inhibit
bacterial hyaluronidase, [5, 6] a class of enzymes
necessary for bacteria to spread through the skin
and mucosal membranes.
To address the uncertainties of composition that
plague so many commercial Echinacea preparations,
a specific botanical preparation
was developed from the roots of E. angustifolia, the
most researched Echinacea species in terms of its
ethnopharmacological and medicinal uses. [7]
Polinacea® is a hydro-alcoholic extract obtained
from the roots of this plant. It is triply standardized
for echinacoside (>2%), IDN5405 (>5%), and
alkamides (< 0.1%).8 [Note: IDN5405 is a polysaccharide
characterized by a highly branched galacturonic
structure, well distinct from the endophytederived
lipopolysaccharides ubiquitous in plant
tissues.]
Since this standardized Echinacea preparation is
intended for long-term prophylactic use as a means
to improve immune system performance, the
profile of the product is intentionally kept very low
in its contents of alkamides. Part of the rationale
for this decision is that, while these compounds
have shown powerful immuno-stimulating activity
in vitro, as exemplified by the stimulation of IFN-?
production by T lymphocytes (not by other types
of lymphocytes), they might be inactive in vivo. [8]
The anti-inflammatory and cytokine-inhibiting
properties of alkamides, [4] though undoubtedly
useful for the mitigation of symptoms once an
infection is in progress, [5] might also potentially be,
in fact, either neutral or counter-productive in
products aimed at the prevention of infections. [5]
The peculiar composition of Polinacea® was
established using cell assays, and was then validated
at the pre-clinical level using an animal
model (Candida sp. infection in normal- or cyclosporine-
treated immunosuppressed mice). In this
model, common endophytic bacterial lipopolysaccharides,
usually active on macrophages, proved
totally inactive. [8]
There has been a growing interest for natural
products capable of modulating the strength and
the duration of the immune response, in particular
linked to seroconversion subsequent to vaccinations.
[9] Most studies in this area have been done
using extracts containing saponins or polysaccharides
of bacterial/fungal origin, frequently in
association with polyphenols. [10] The preliminary
results obtained from studies in this area provide a
rationale for assessment of other natural products,
which might potentially augment the immune
response to vaccinations. This research was
undertaken to provide preliminary data on
whether Polinacea® might augment the immune
response to influenza vaccination, [11] and whether
its use would have any clinical relevance in terms of
influenza morbidity in instances where vaccination
was not administered.
Discussion
In order to avoid the issues of (1) poor characterization
of constituents used, and (2) ambiguity of
the source of the Echinacea being used, we used a
standardized Echinacea preparation (triple
standardization for IDN5405 >5%, echinacoside
>2%, and alkamides <0.1%) that was derived
exclusively from underground parts from a single
source of known botanical origin (E. angustifolia).
This product (Polinacea®) was investigated in two
distinct groups of volunteers – adults with existing
respiratory disorders and healthy adolescents – to
determine whether alone or, in the case of the
adults with existing respiratory disorders, in
combination with the influenza vaccine, it could
influence the occurrence of symptoms suggestive
of influenza or parainfluenza infection. Results
showed a statistically significant tendency for this
triple-standardized Echinacea preparation, either
alone or in combination with vaccination, to be
more efficacious than the vaccination alone,
suggesting that this product has the potential to
act synergistically with influenza vaccination. The
small number of participants precludes any
definitive inferences or conclusions in this area.
In a subset of the first pilot trial – the ME group – lab work was conducted for some parameters of
immune function. The results observed suggest
that the active treatment might have altered
immunoglobulin levels, since IgG increased and
IgM decreased. White blood cell indices, including
monocyte-macrophage and/or neutrophil-mediated
response, were not affected by
supplementation.
Limitations of this study include the small size
of the sample population, a lack of a comparison
with other Echinacea preparations, and the failure
to monitor aspects of immune performance in all
participants. Because of these limitations, our
results should be considered preliminary. There
were no complaints of side effects in our two pilot
studies, and in the first pilot study, there were
fewer respiratory complications when the
Echinacea preparation was provided either alone or
in combination with the vaccine. This excellent
tolerability of the extract used, combined with our
preliminary results suggesting a potential clinical
benefit, provide a rationale to undertake a systematic
study on the effects of standardized Echinacea
preparations alone or in combination with influenza
vaccination in larger trials in order to determine
whether these types of products can reduce
influenza episodes in individuals at risk (e.g.,
adolescents, elderly people).