Prospective Back Pain Trajectories or Retrospective Recall
- Which Tells Us Most About the Patient?

This section is compiled by Frank M. Painter, D.C.
Send all comments or additions to:     Frankp@chiro.org

FROM:   J Pain 2024 (May 6): 104555 ~ FULL TEXT

OPEN ACCESS

---

Casper Nim • Aron S. Downie • Alice Kongsted Steen Harsted • Luana Nyirö • Werner Vach et al

Medical Research Unit,
Spine Centre of Southern Denmark,
University Hospital of Southern Denmark,
Middelfart, Denmark

---

HERE

---

In patients with low back pain (LBP), a visually identified retrospective pain trajectory often mismatches with a trajectory derived from prospective repeated measures. To gain insight into the clinical relevance of the 2 trajectory types, we investigated which showed a higher association with clinical outcomes. Participants were 724 adults seeking care for LBP in Danish chiropractic primary care. They answered weekly short-message-services on pain intensity and frequency over 52 weeks, which we translated into 8 trajectory classes. After 52 weeks, participants selected a retrospective visual pain trajectory from the same 8 trajectory classes. Clinical outcomes included disability, back/leg pain intensity, back beliefs, and work ability. The patient-selected pain trajectory classes were more strongly associated with clinical outcomes than the short-message-service trajectory classes at baseline, at follow-up, and with outcome changes between baseline and follow-up. This held across all 5 clinical outcomes, with the strongest associations observed at week 52 and the weakest at baseline. Patients' retrospective assessment of their LBP is more strongly associated with their clinical status than their prospective assessments translated into trajectory classes. This suggests that retrospective assessments of pain trajectories may provide valuable information not captured by prospective assessments. Researchers collecting prospective pain data should know that the captured pain trajectories are not strongly reflected in patients' perceptions of clinical status. Patients' retrospective assessments seem to offer an interpretation of their pain course that is likely more clinically relevant in understanding the perceived impact of their condition than trajectories based on repeated measures. PERSPECTIVE: Prospective pain data inadequately reflect patients' clinical status. Retrospective assessments provide a more clinically valuable understanding of the impact of their condition.

Keywords:   Low back pain; pain pattern; pain perception; pain trajectory; primary care.

---

References:

1. Kongsted A, Kent P, Axen I, Downie AS, Dunn KM.
   What Have We Learned From Ten Years
   of Trajectory Research in Low Back Pain?
   BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 (May 21); 17 (1): 220

2. Deyo RA, Bryan M, Comstock BA, Turner JA, Heagerty P,
   Friedly J, Avins AL, Nedeljkovic SS, Nerenz DR, Jarvik JG.
   Trajectories of symptoms and function in older adults with low back disorders.
   Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015;40(17):1352-62

3. Downie, AS, Hancock, MJ, Rzewuska, M, Williams, CM, Lin, CW, and Maher, CG.
   Trajectories of Acute Low Back Pain:
   A Latent Class Growth Analysis
   Pain. 2016 (Jan); 157 (1): 225–234

4. Dunn, K.M., Campbell, P., and Jordan, K.P.
   Long-term Trajectories of Back Pain:
   Cohort Study With 7-year Follow-up
   BMJ Open. 2013 (Dec 11); 3 (12): e003838

5. Dunn KM, Jordan K, Croft PR.
   Characterizing the Course of Low Back Pain:
   A Latent Class Analysis
   American J Epidemiology 2006 (Apr 15); 163 (8): 754–761

6. Hestbaek L. Leboeuf-Yde C. Manniche C.
   Low Back Pain: What Is The Long-term Course?
   A Review of Studies of General Patient Populations
   Eur Spine J. 2003; 12: 149-165

7. Kongsted, A, Kent, P, Hestbaek, L, and Vach, W.
   Patients With Low Back Pain Had Distinct Clinical Course Patterns
   That Were Typically Neither Complete Recovery Nor Constant Pain.
   A Latent Class Analysis of Longitudinal Data
   Spine J. 2015 (May 1); 15 (5): 885–894

8. Macedo LG, Maher CG, Latimer J, McAuley JH, Hodges PW, Rogers WT.
   Nature and determinants of the course of chronic low back pain
   over a 12-month period:
   a cluster analysis.
   Phys Ther. 2014;94(2):210–21

9. Tamcan O, Mannion AF, Eisenring C, Horisberger B, Elfering A, Muller U.
   The course of chronic and recurrent low back pain in the general population.
   Pain. 2010;150(3):451–7

10. Kongsted A. Hestbæk L. Kent P.
    How Can Latent Trajectories of Back Pain
    be Translated into Defined Subgroups?
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 (Jul 3); 18 (1): 285

11. Dunn K.M. Campbell P. Jordan K.P.
    Validity of the Visual Trajectories Questionnaire for Pain
    J Pain. 2017 (Dec); 18 (12): 1451–1458

12. Irgens P. Myhrvold B.L. Kongsted A. et al.
    Exploring visual pain trajectories in neck pain patients, using
    clinical course, SMS-based patterns, and patient haracteristics:
    a cohort study.
    Chiropr Man Ther. 2022; 30: 37

13. Myhrvold B.L. Irgens P. Robinson H.S. et al.
    Visual Trajectory Pattern as Prognostic Factors for Neck Pain
    European J Pain 2020 (Oct); 24 (9): 1752–1764

14. C.G. Nim, A. Kongsted, A. Downie, W. Vach
    Temporal stability of self-reported visual back pain trajectories
    Pain, 163 (2022), pp. e1104-e1114

15. Nim C.G. Vach W. Downie A. et al.
    Do Visual Pain Trajectories Reflect the Actual
    Course of Low Back Pain? A Longitudinal Cohort Study
    J Pain 2023 (Apr 10); S1526-5900(23)00395-4

16. Kongsted A. Nielsen O.L. Christensen H.W. et al.
    The Danish Chiropractic Low Back Pain Cohort (ChiCo):
    description and summary of an available data source
    for research collaborations.
    Clin Epidemiol. 2020; 12: 1015-1027

17. Danish Research Ethics Committees.
    What to notify? 2024. (cited March 31, 2024).
    Available from: https://researchethics.dk/guidelines.

18. Patrick D.L. Deyo R.A. Atlas S.J. et al.
    Assessing health-related quality of life in patients with sciatica.
    Spine. 1995; 20: 1899-1908

19. Lauridsen H.H. Hartvigsen J. Manniche C. et al.
    Danish version of the Oswestry Disability Index for patients with
    low back pain. Part 1: Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability
    and validity in two different populations.
    Eur Spine J. 2006; 15: 1705-1716

20. Grøn S. Jensen R.K. Jensen T.S. et al.
    Back beliefs in patients with low back pain:
    a primary care cohort study.
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019; 20: 578

21. Ahlstrom L. Grimby-Ekman A. Hagberg M. et al.
    The work ability index and single-item question: associations with
    sick leave, symptoms, and health–a prospective study of women
    on long-term sick leave.
    Scand J Work Environ Health. 2010; 36: 404-412

22. Landis J.R. Koch G.G.
    The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data.
    Biometrics. 1977; 33: 159-174

23. Irgens P. Myhrvold B.L. Kongsted A. et al.
    The Clinical Course of Neck Pain:
    Are Trajectory Patterns Stable Over a 1-year Period?
    European Journal of Pain 2022 (Feb); 26 (2): 531–542

24. Vertsberger D. Talmon A. Ziadni M. et al.
    Intensity of chronic low back pain and activity interference:
    a daily diary study of the moderating role of
    cognitive pain coping strategies.
    Pain Med. 2023; 24: 442-450

Return to TRAJECTORIES OF LOW BACK PAIN

Since 8-18-2024