FROM:
J Can Chiropr Assoc 2009 (Aug); 53 (3): 194–204 ~ FULL TEXT
Bart N. Green, DC, MSEd, Claire D. Johnson, DC, MSEd
Anthony J. Lisi, DC, John Tucker, PhD
Chiropractic Division,
Department of Physical and Occupational Therapy,
Naval Medical Center San Diego,
MCAS Miramar Branch Medical Clinic,
PO Box 452002, San Diego, CA 92145-2002
OBJECTIVE: To summarize scholarly literature that describes practice, utilization, and/or policy of chiropractic services within international active duty and/or veteran health care environments.
DATA SOURCES: PubMed, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and the Index to Chiropractic Literature were searched from their starting dates through June 2009.
REVIEW METHODS: All authors independently reviewed each of the articles to verify that each met the inclusion criteria. Citations of included papers and other pertinent findings were logged in a summary table.
RESULTS: Thirteen articles were included in this study. Integration of chiropractic care into military or veteran health care systems has been described in 3 systems: the United States Department of Defense, the United States Department of Veterans Affairs, and the Canadian Forces.
CONCLUSION: Chiropractic services seem to be included successfully within military and veteran health care facilities. However, there is a great need for additional written evaluation of the processes, policies, practices, and effectiveness of chiropractic services in these environments.
KEYWORDS: Chiropractic; Hospitals; Military Medicine; Military Personnel; Veterans
From the FULL TEXT Article:
Introduction
The use of various forms of complementary and alternative
medicine (CAM) continues to grow internationally. [1]
Eisenberg and colleagues [2] defined CAM as: “Interventions
not taught widely at US medical schools or generally
available at US hospitals.” Popular CAM practices
include: herbal remedies, yoga, acupuncture, and chiropractic. [1]
Chiropractic care has been used reportedly by
7.4%1 to 11% [3] of the general American adult population,
representing approximately 190 million office visits per
year and about 30% of all CAM practitioner visits. [4]
Smith and colleagues recently reported that as much as
one third of United States (US) Navy and Marine Corps
personnel utilize some form of CAM. [5]
Recently, there has been increased interest in how doctors
of chiropractic may be integrated within military and
veteran healthcare facilities. [6] More than a decade has
passed since Lott’s [7] postulation in the journal Military
Medicine regarding how, or if, chiropractic services
would be integrated into the military health care system.
Starting in 1995, a 3-year demonstration program showed
successful inclusion of the service in 10 different US Department
of Defense (DoD) sites. [8] The service is currently
available at 49 military treatment facilities across the
United States, [9] and continues to expand. [10] More recently,
in 2004, chiropractic care was introduced into the US Department
of Veterans Affairs (VA) [11] and is now available
at 36 VA facilities. In Canada, chiropractic care is currently
offered at 1 military hospital. [12]
Despite the availability of numerous published articles
regarding chiropractic care and the chiropractic profession
in general, the number of writings about chiropractic
care specifically included within the military/veteran setting
is unknown. Since chiropractic care is the primary
CAM practice now included within military and veteran
hospitals, a survey of existing literature may assist practitioners
in the art of evidence-based practice, guide administrators
in the practice of evidence-based health care,
focus future research efforts, and ultimately benefit military
and veteran patients. Knowing how chiropractic care
is utilized within these environments may aid with quality
improvement and assist decision makers to determine
if further inclusion of chiropractic services is warranted.
The purpose of this study was to identify and summarize
scholarly literature that describes chiropractic practice,
utilization, and/or policy included within international
active duty and/or veteran health care systems, and to
provide suggestions for how to increase research productivity
from these unique environments.
Methods
Search Strategy
Table 1
|
PubMed and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied
Health Literature (CINAHL) were searched using EBSCOhost
Web. The Index to Chiropractic Literature (ICL)
was reviewed directly at its site (www.chiroindex.org).
Searches for all databases were from the starting dates of
each through June 2009. In PubMed we combined the
term “chiropractic” with a variety of terms relevant to the
topic (Table 1). “Complementary medicine” and “alternative
medicine” were also combined with other terms
(Table 1) in an effort to broaden the search and capture all
relevant publications. The same strategy was used with
CINAHL. Pertinent hits were verified against the previously
recorded relevant citations (ie, those that met inclusion
criteria) from the PubMed search; these were
noted as “new hits” in Table 1. This procedure was used
for the ICL search, verifying results from the ICL against
both PubMed and CINAHL. We searched for additional
articles by reading the references found in the articles
retrieved, searching our personal libraries, and by contacting
authors who have published in this area.
Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria
All languages and research designs from any country,
and only articles from peer-reviewed scholarly journals,
were included in the search. Commentaries from nonpeer
reviewed sources (eg, trade magazines) and other
non-scholarly sources were excluded, as were writings
not specific to the reported use of chiropractic or of
chiropractic in military or veteran facilities. Abstracts of
conference proceedings were not included due to the high
rate of conference presentations that never reach full publication. [13, 14]
Articles were considered for final inclusion
if they described practice, utilization, and/or policy of
chiropractic within active duty and/or veteran health care
environments.
Methods of Review
Table 2
|
The search process was conducted by the primary author;
co-authors were asked to contribute citations with which
they were familiar but which might be missing from the
list created by the primary author. Abstracts of the citations
that obviously or possibly met the review criteria
were saved. The full papers of each abstract were then retrieved.
Each article was independently reviewed to verify
that it met the inclusion criteria. Papers that did not
meet the criteria were discarded and a note was made as
to why they were excluded. Once a paper was included,
the citation, study design, principal findings, and other
pertinent notes were logged in a summary table (Table 2).
Quality scoring was not performed as the articles reviewed
were descriptive and not homogenous.
Results
Forty-three potential articles were identified (41 from literature
searches and 2 from colleagues published in this
topic area) and 13 were acceptable for review, [12, 15–26] thus
30 papers [5, 7, 27–54] had been excluded. Reasons for exclusion
are presented in Table 2. The most common reason
papers were excluded was because they described the use
of CAM amongst military or veteran beneficiaries, but
included no breakdown of the utilization of chiropractic
care from the larger set of CAM practices. Also, it was
not made clear whether the chiropractic care included in
the CAM practices discussed was provided at a designated
military or veteran health care facility or if chiropractic
care was obtained from outside sources. Two papers
with apparent US military/veteran and chiropractic relevance
that were excluded were those by Lott [7] and
Coulter [3.3] and this deserves further explanation. Lott’s paper
predated the inclusion of chiropractic services in the
DoD or VA environments and was a commentary forecasting
how the service might be included; it was excluded
because it did not discuss actual working settings.
Coulter’s paper was a critique of a VA study that investigated
the use of VA care vs. fee-for-service spinal manipulation
performed by chiropractors for veterans with low
back pain. This paper was excluded because it did not involve
the use of chiropractic care within the VA setting.
Table 3A
Table 3B
|
Integration of chiropractic care into military or veteran
health care systems has been described in 3 systems: the
DoD, the VA, and the Canadian Forces. The predominance
of papers is from the US. A summary of the included
articles is presented in Table 3. Three crosssectional
studies, 1 descriptive educational study, 3 surveys,
3 case reports, and 3 commentaries comprise the
literature on the topic of chiropractic care in military or
veteran health care.
Dunn and colleagues [18] authored the first paper to describe
a VA chiropractic clinic along with some demographics
of its patients, most of whom had received
medical or physical therapy management prior to chiropractic
care. This is predictable, as many VA patients
have chronic disorders. The overwhelming majority of
patients (82%) were referred for chiropractic care because
of low back complaints, were male (88%), an average
age of 55 years, and most of the consults originated
from primary care.
Previous treatments included:
medical management (n = 67)
physical therapy (n = 49)
chiropractic (n = 19)
acupuncture (n = 4)
surgeries (n = 3)
massage therapy (n = 2).
Fifty percent of the patients had
service-connected disability.
Dunn and Passmore [23] followed up on this study in
2008 and rendered essentially the same findings, but also
included data on veterans with a diagnosis of post traumatic
stress disorder (PTSD), revealing that 16% of the
patients in the sample had this diagnosis. The number of
lumbar cases referred to chiropractic care dropped by
16% compared to the first study.
More recently, Dunn and colleagues [25] followed up on
the PTSD/musculoskeletal pain connection and analyzed
baseline and discharge pain and disability scores for veterans
with both neck and low back regions and for those
patients with and without PTSD. They found that patients
with PTSD experienced significantly lower levels of
score improvement than those without PTSD, suggesting
that the success of conservative forms of management for
veterans may be limited by the presence of PTSD.
Due to the large number of consults referred to their
VA clinic, Dunn and Passmore [21] offered suggestions for
managing the influx of new consults and commented on
efficiencies that may be used in the VA system to maximize
the use of chiropractic care.
Dunn [16] was the first to report on training opportunities
for chiropractic students in VA or DoD medical treatment
facilities. He provides a description of the development
of a chiropractic intern training program at the
Western New York VA and how it was implemented.
Additional training opportunities developed at 2 naval
hospitals at the time were also discussed. No program
evaluation was reported, however. Further information
regarding the growing VA training opportunities was
provided by Dunn in 2007. [20] This paper described the
process that is used to establish an affiliation agreement
between VA and academic institutions and provided a
comparison of such affiliations, programs, facilities, and
other parameters for those VA hospitals with chiropractic
training programs. [20]
There is 1 paper published pertaining to DoD chiropractic
training programs. [17] In this survey study, interns
who had participated in a rotation through a US naval
hospital were compared to interns who did not have this
opportunity. A variety of variables were considered, but
the focus was on whether there was a significant difference
in career quality of life indicators, such as job satisfaction
and income once these interns were in active
professional practice. No such difference was present.
Two case reports pertaining to the use of chiropractic
care and active duty US military members have been reported
by Green and colleagues. [19, 22] Both of these cases
report the interdisciplinary clinical management of cases
of low back pain, one for a jet fighter pilot [19] and the other
for an enlisted US Marine with a rare sacral anomaly. [22]
There is 1 case report about a veteran receiving chiropractic
care, wherein a female veteran who presented
with chest pain was managed in an interdisciplinary manner
and eventually had resolution of her symptoms with
cervico-thoracic spinal manipulation. [26]
Despite chiropractic care being included in the DoD,
VA, and Canadian Forces for a number of years, what
chiropractors do, how they function within military or
veteran health care centers, and suggestions for how other
health care providers might work with chiropractors
was only published in 2009. [15] Finally, some interest in
how chiropractors who work in military and veteran hospitals
might become involved in public health efforts has
been reported by Johnson et al. [24]
We found only 1 paper from outside the US that discussed
the use of chiropractic care in military or veteran
facilities in Canada. Boudreau et al [12] surveyed military
patients and physicians regarding their satisfaction with
chiropractic services at the 1 location in Canada where
chiropractic care is included at a military or veteran treatment
facility. The response rate was 67.6% (69 of 102)
for patients, and 83.3% (10 of 12) for physicians. In each
group, the majority of respondents (94.2% of military
personnel and 80.0% of referring physicians) reported
satisfaction with chiropractic services. The authors also
reported that most patients were referred for chiropractic
care for low back pain and that referring physicians preferred
to make chiropractic referrals for axial, musculoskeletal
complaints. [12]
Discussion
Main Findings
Our primary finding that little published research exists
on chiropractic care within veteran or military integrated
health care delivery systems is surprising, since chiropractic
services have been part of the military medical
system for over 14 years in the US and 9 years in Canada.
The 13 papers identified and reviewed represent initial
reports of chiropractic integration with veteran and military
medicine in the areas of education, clinical care,
clinical processes, and public health.
The literature on this topic is entirely descriptive in nature,
which we feel is appropriate given that this is a nascent
area of investigation by the profession. If one were
to use the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine
levels of evidence [55] to categorize the included studies,
then the level of evidence generated from these integrated
environments would be levels 4 and 5 on a scale from
1 to 5 with 5 being the lowest score. Clearly, while the efforts
achieved thus far are noteworthy, there is much
more work to establish an evidence base pertaining to effectiveness,
best practices, or policy specific to the active
duty and veteran population cared for in integrated health
care systems where chiropractors are working.
Practice, Utilization, and Policy
Based upon these 13 papers, we offer a glimpse of chiropractic
services within military and veteran settings. Chiropractic
patients include those who may not have
experienced prior chiropractic care and typically access
chiropractic services through primary care providers.
Chiropractic care is provided at the same facilities where
other healthcare services are provided. Patients tend to
have musculoskeletal complaints but may have other
complicating factors (eg, post traumatic stress syndrome).
There are high levels of patient satisfaction with
chiropractic care in the practices described. Chiropractic
care of patients tends to be integrated and multidisciplinary
in nature. An exception to this may be Canada,
where many patients are referred to chiropractors typically
at the patient’s request; military personnel may access
care only by referral, often when other treatments have
been unsuccessful. No data are available concerning utilization
or referral protocols. There are educational programs
that provide experiences for interns in the VA and
DoD environments and there are many opportunities for
doctors of chiropractic to participate in public health initiatives
in the DoD and VA.
Musculoskeletal problems are common in the military,
both at home and in combat theater [56–58 ] and affect service
members across many occupational specialties. [59] Given
that providers in military and veteran settings refer patients
to chiropractic services for musculoskeletal problems,
chiropractors have the potential to contribute in a
very positive manner to relieve this huge health care burden.
However, at this time it is unclear how often chiropractic
services are utilized within a given facility. It is
unreported if patients who receive multidisciplinary care
have better outcomes than those only receiving one type
of care. No clear reports of policy or cost effectiveness
were found in this review. Without specific data to state
otherwise, it is assumed that access to care varies widely
across jurisdictions, especially where there are competing
models for the care of musculoskeletal disorders. Studies
that explore collaborative models would be particularly
useful, especially if those studies examined a number of
sites in different countries. This short series of articles
demonstrates that inclusion of chiropractic within the
military healthcare system is possible and may be beneficial
for certain disorders; however, more details are needed
to produce reproducible and robust summaries.
Increasing Research Capacity
More information about the implementation of chiropractic
services as a health care benefit in the DoD, VA,
Canadian Forces, and other countries is needed. Analysis
will require systematic assessment; health care administrators
and policy makers will need to know whether or
not chiropractic care is effective in these environments,
for what conditions it might be effective, if it represents a
good expenditure of funds, and posit other relevant queries.
Unfortunately, as of this writing, no published evidence
in the peer reviewed literature was found that sheds
light on these questions. If the prevailing state of chiropractic
services is to be evaluated, further data need to be
explored and results published. Important areas for future
inquiry will include assessment of structures of care (e.g.,
models of clinical implementation and provider training
and characteristics), processes of care (e.g., clinical
practices and procedures; provider workload and productivity;
process of integration), and outcomes of care (e.g.,
clinical outcomes and cost effectiveness).
Specific research questions to consider might include
the following. Are components of chiropractic care effective
in improving the management of spinal conditions in
military and veteran populations? Is there a clinical prediction
rule that would best determine when chiropractic
consultation would likely be of most benefit to a patient
with a particular problem who presents to a primary care
manager? In what measurable ways does adding a chiropractic
clinic contribute to system performance, quality,
or military readiness? If chiropractic care is provided onstation,
does it reduce utilization of other services and thus
improve access to these services? For what conditions is
chiropractic care most effective and cost effective in the
military and veteran populations? Is chiropractic utilization,
frequency of treatment, and use of adjunctive therapies
reasonably uniform within each health care system?
These and other metrics can be used to guide the decisionmaking
process of our health care system. In order to meet
these research needs, we suggest that the issues of training,
time, funding, and collaboration be addressed.
Training:
The majority of chiropractors currently in these
environments are not formally trained as researchers or
authors. This may explain why so few studies appear in
the current review. To be effective, practitioners will need
to be trained in the methods of research and scholarly
writing, and develop mentorships with experienced authors
at their facilities. Alternatively, health care facilities
will need to put high priority on these skill sets when
assessing future chiropractors as provider candidates.
Further, training in grant writing will be necessary to secure
adequate funding to conduct the advanced studies,
and/or seasoned researchers will have to be secured to aid
in this process.
Time:
Sufficient time needs to be set aside for research
activities. For example, chiropractors in the DoD are
hired or contracted for patient care and 100% of the practitioner’s
professional workload is dedicated to duties relating
to clinical concerns. A similar situation exists at
the Archie McCallum hospital in Nova Scotia. As a result,
even if a practitioner is trained in research methods
and scientific writing, no time is allowed to engage in
this activity. Some precedent for allowing research activities
to occupy a percentage of a given chiropractor’s
duty requirements is provided in the VA system. Publication
and scholarly activity are elements of the VA Chiropractic
Qualification Standards utilized for rank and
promotion; this offers incentive for providers to engage
in constructive writing on the subject of chiropractic
practices. For research productivity to exist, time must be
allocated.
Funding:
Funding is an essential component associated
with the successful completion of research studies. In addition
to intramural funding already available at some facilities,
grants will need to be secured from outside the
system and through collaborative efforts with outside investigators.
Attracting the interest of seasoned, non-chiropractic
researchers may largely be influenced by the
availability of funding. The VA Office of Research and
Development has issued a request for applications on chiropractic
care research; at the time of this writing, one
project has been funded and another is in review. External
funding from sources such as the National Center for
Complementary and Alternative Medicine, Canadian Institutes
of Health Research, and Canadian Chiropractic
Association may also be available. Additionally, private
foundations, such as the Samueli Center for Research on
Integrative Medicine in the Military, may be sources of
additional support. At the time of this writing, the Samueli
Institute has funded one VA project and two DoD
projects, with subsequent studies under consideration.
Additional funding sources need to be identified and secured
to complete research projects.
Collaboration:
Larger data-driven studies require the
time, money, and resources to which most individual
practitioners do not have access. Military and veteran
hospitals have some personnel and resources (departments
of research and investigation, institutional review
boards, medical writers, etc.) available to assist in the research
effort. Chiropractic practitioners in these hospitals
can form a working relationship with these resources. In
addition, working with universities or external research
departments can provide the means necessary to implement
and complete complex endeavors, such as clinical
trials and case control studies. In many instances research
agendas develop from successful clinical collaborations
where providers come to know one another and learn
about one another’s health care. When collaboration is
missing the impetus to deepen research question is also
missing, so such research may be difficult to launch.
Limitations
Several limitations exist with the current study. Few articles
were found in this search, thus, caution should be
used in drawing absolute conclusions from the results. It
is possible that internal or unpublished studies exist that
provide more details that would help to answer our research
question; however, with no ability to access such
reports, this paper only reports literature that is publicly
available. We have heard anecdotes about chiropractic
care being available in other countries, such as Israel, but
were unable to locate any peer-reviewed sources of such
information. Some efforts at investigating various aspects
of chiropractic in military or veteran environments may
be reported in conference abstracts. Since we excluded
conference abstracts from the study, we may have missed
some information. However, there are many conference
presentations that are never published, which essentially
means that such endeavors are not actual evidence that
one can use in the process of evidence-informed health
care practice and policy. A final note on conference abstracts
is that they often contain preliminary data that are
sometimes rushed off to a conference chair during the
eleventh hour prior to a submission deadline; material
written in a hastened manner may contain inaccuracies
and misinform the evidence. Therefore, while we may
have missed a few research efforts in abstracts, we feel
we are justified in not including them. Further, the level
of evidence for the 13 papers included in this review is
comprised of cross-sectional studies, surveys, case reports,
and commentaries; thus, the generalizability of the
data may be limited.
Conclusion
Our review of the literature revealed 13 studies that might
guide future chiropractic practice or policy in the military
or veteran health care environment. This paper provides a
summary of early reports of how some chiropractic services
have functioned successfully in military and veteran
health care facilities. Chiropractors work within a multidisciplinary
healthcare environment, manage neuromusculokeletal
and other complaints, work with primary care
providers, and have high levels of patient satisfaction. This
study points to the need for additional high quality documentation.
In order to develop a process for evaluating
chiropractic services in military and veteran integrated
health care delivery systems, more published research is
needed. We suggest that in order to develop a greater
literature base, additional training, time, funding, and collaboration
are needed.
REFERENCES