Table 18Chronic low back pain: multidisciplinary rehabilitation

Author, Year, Followup, Pain Duration, Study QualityInterventionPopulationFunction and Pain OutcomesOther Outcomes

Abbassi, 2012

10.25 months

Duration of pain: ~6 years

Poor

A. Multidisciplinary rehabilitation (n=12), 7 sessions over 7 weeks

B. Multidisciplinary pain management (spouse-assisted) (n=10). 7 sessions over 7 weeks

C: Usual care (n=11)

A + B + C

Overall

Age (mean): 45 years

Female: 88%

A vs. B vs. C

Baseline (0–24): 12.1 vs. 11.2 vs. 8.4

Baseline pain (0-10 ): 4.6 vs. 5 vs. 3.6

A vs. B vs. C

10.25 months

(0–24): 8.8 vs. 8.2 vs. 10.4, p=0.44

Pain (0–10 ): 3.7 vs. 2.8 vs. 4.3, p=0.44

Bendix, 1995, 1997, 1998

60 months

Duration of pain: >6 months

Fair

A. Multidisciplinary rehabilitation (n=40), 18 sessions over 6 weeks (total ~135 hours)

B. Multidisciplinary rehabilitation (n=35), 12 sessions over 6 weeks (total 24 hours)

C. Exercise (n=31)

A vs. B vs. C

Age: 40 vs. 44 vs. 42

Female: 75% vs. 77% vs. 74%

Baseline pain (0-10 ): 5.3 vs. 5.9 vs. 5.4

Baseline Low Back Pain Rating Scale (0-30): 15.5 vs. 15.3 vs. 14.4

A vs. B vs. C

3.25 months

Back pain (0-10 ): 2.7 vs. 5.6 vs. 4.4, p<0.001

Low Back Pain Rating Scale (0-30): 8.5 vs. 16.1 vs. 13.5, p=0.002

12 months

Back pain (0-10 ): 3.3 vs. 6.5 vs. 5.3, p=0.005

Low Back Pain Rating Scale (0-30): 8.9 vs. 16.4 vs. 13.7, p<0.001

24 months

Back pain (0-10 ): 3 vs. 6 vs. 5, p=0.08

Low Back Pain Rating Scale (0-30): 10 vs. 17 vs. 14, p=0.003

60 months

Back pain (0-10 ): 4 vs. 6 vs. 5, p=0.3

Low Back Pain Rating Scale (0-30): 8 vs. 16 vs. 14, p=0.02

A vs. B vs. C

3.25 months

Days of sick leave: 25 vs.122 vs. 13, p=0.005

Healthcare system contacts: 0.5 vs. 2.8 vs. 1.3, p=0.05

12 months

Days of sick leave: 52 vs. 295 vs. 100, p=0.002

Healthcare system contacts: 4.5 vs. 12.0 vs. 11.8, p=0.002

Days of sick leave: 2.5 vs. 37 vs. 11, p=0.06

24 months

Healthcare system contacts: 5 vs. 21 vs. 14, p=0.03

Overall assessment (1-5): 2 vs. 3 vs. 3, p=0.005

60 months

Overall assessment (1-5): 2 vs. 3 vs. 3, p=0.004

Increase in proportion able to work: 30% vs. 23% vs. 0%, p=0.001

Days of sick leave: 13 vs. 11 vs. 88, p=0.2

Healthcare system contacts: 15 vs. 10 vs. 24, p=0.2

Back surgery: 5% vs. 10% vs. 10%, p=0.7

Bendix,1996, 1998

60 months

Duration of pain: >6 months

Fair

A. Multidisciplinary rehabilitation (n=55), 18 sessions over 6 weeks (total ~135 hours)

B. Usual care (n=51)

A vs. B

Age 41 vs.40 years

Female: 71% vs. 69%

Baseline pain (0-10 ): 6.1 vs. 6.1

Baseline Low Back Pain Rating Scale (0-30): 16.9 vs. 15.9

A vs. B

3.25 months

Back pain (0-10 ): 5.7 vs. 6.9, p=0.05

Low Back Pain Rating Scale (0-30): 12.1 vs. 16.8, p<0.001

24 months

Back pain (0-10 ): 6 vs. 6.5, p=0.5

Low Back Pain Rating Scale (0-30): 16 vs. 15, p=0.9

60 months

Back pain (0-10 ): 5 vs. 5, p=1.0

Low Back Pain Rating Scale (0-30): 12 vs. 16, p=0.2

A vs. B

3.25 months

Days of sick leave: 10 vs. 122, p=0.02

Contacts to health-care system: 1.6 vs. 5.3, p<0.001

24 months

Days of sick leave: 15 vs. 123, p<0.001

Healthcare system contacts: 12 vs. 26, p<0.001

60 months

Days of sick leave: 10 vs. 50, p=0.4

Healthcare system contacts: 16 vs. 48, p=0.1

Back surgery: 7% vs. 12%, p=0.4

Bendix, 2000

10 months

Duration of pain: Not reported

Fair

A. Multidisciplinary rehabilitation (n=59), 18 sessions over 8 weeks (total ~139 hours)

B. Exercise (n=68)

A vs. B

Age: 40 vs. 43 years

Female: 66% vs. 65%

Baseline function:

Baseline pain:

A vs. B

10 months

Back pain (0–10): 5.1 vs. 5.7, p=0.33

Low Back Pain Rating Scale (0–30 ): 12 vs. 13, p=0.41

A vs. B

10 months

Overall assessment (1–5): 1.7 vs. 2.7, p=0.03

Work capable: 75% vs. 69%, p=0.64

Healthcare contacts (number): 2.5 vs. 4, p=0.28

Harkapaa, 1989

1 month

Duration of pain: >2 years

Poor

A. Multidisciplinary rehabilitation (inpatient) (n=156), 3 weeks (number of sessions and total hours unclear)

B. Multidisciplinary rehabilitation (outpatient) (n=150), 15 sessions over 8 weeks (total hours unclear)

C. Usual care (n=153)

A vs. B vs. C

Age: 45 vs. 45 vs. 45 years

Female: 37% vs. 39% vs. 35%

Baseline function, Disability Index (0-45): 16.7 vs. 17.6 vs. 16.7

Baseline Pain Index (0-400): 184.9 vs. 178.6 vs. 175.8

A vs. B vs. C

1 month

Disability Index (0-45): 13.8 vs. 14.7 vs. 17.3, p<0.004 for A vs. C and p<0.01 for B vs. C

Pain Index (0-400): 127 vs. 145 vs. 160, p<0.001 for A vs. C and p<0.04 for B vs. C

Jousset, 2004

5 months

Duration of pain: >4 months

Poor

A. Multidisciplinary rehabilitation (n=44), 25 sessions over 5 weeks (total 150 hours)

B. Exercise (n=42)

A vs. B

Age: 41 vs. 40 years

Female: 30% vs. 37%

Baseline function Quebec Disability Scale (0-100): 34.6 vs. 31.6 Baseline pain (0-10 ): 5.0 vs. 4.6

A vs. B

5 months

Quebec Disability Scale (0-100): 22.0 vs. 22.9, p=0.80

Pain (0-10 ): 3.1 vs. 4.0, p=0.01

Dallas Pain Questionnaire (0-100): 36.7 vs. 41.5, p=0.36

A vs. B

5 months

Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (0-21): 12.7 vs. 13.4 (6.4), p=0.62

Dallas Pain Questionnaire Social interest (0-100): 19.6 vs. 24.3, p=0.37

Lambeek 2010

9 months

Duration of pain: >4 months

Fair

A. Multidisciplinary rehabilitation (n=66), 26+ sessions over up to 13 weeks (total hours unclear)

B. Usual care (n=68)

A vs. B

Age: 46 vs. 47 years

Female: 44% vs. 40%

Baseline modified (0-23): 14.7 vs. 15.0

Baseline pain (0-10 ): 5.7 vs. 6.3

A vs. B

3 months

Modified (0-23): 4.8 vs. 5.0 (0.9), adjusted difference 0.06, 95% −2.3 to 2.5

Pain (0-10 ): 1.3 vs. 2.3, adjusted difference 0.5, 95% −0.6 to 1.6

9 months

Modified (0-23): 7.2 vs. 4.4, adjusted difference −2.9, 95% −4.9 to −0.9

Pain (0-10 ): 1.6 vs. 1.9, adjusted difference 0.21, 95% −0.8 to 1.2

A vs. B

9 months

General practitioner visits (# of patients): 13 vs. 29

Medical specialist visits (# of patients): 13 vs. 29

Total costs (pounds): 13,165 ( 13,600) vs. 18,475 (SD 13,616), difference −5,310 (95% −10,042 to −391)

Monticone 2013

23 months

Duration of pain: 25 vs. 26 months

Fair

A. Multidisciplinary rehabilitation (n=45), 26 sessions over 5 weeks (total 26 hours)

B. Exercise (n=45)

A vs. B

Age: 49 vs. 50 years

Female: 60% vs. 56%

Baseline (0-24): 15.3 vs. 15.0 Baseline pain (0-10 ): 7.0 vs. 7.0

A vs. B

11 months

(0-24): 1.3 (1.6) vs. 11.0 (2.0)

Pain (0-10 ): 1.4 (1.1) vs. 5.3 (1.2)

23 months

(0-24): 1.4 vs. 11.1, difference −9.7, 95% −10.4 to −9.0

Pain (0-10 ): 1.5 vs. 6.2, difference −4.7, 95% −5.1 to −4.3

A vs. B

11 months

SF-36 physical pain (0-100): 79.0 (14.6) vs. 52.0 (16.2)

SF-36 physical functioning (0-100): 85.7 (19.6) vs. 62.1 (19.4)

SF-36 general health (0-100): 85.0 (13.8) vs. 56.4 (15.9)

SF-36 mental health (0-100): 89.8 (13.0) vs. 54.1 (11.9)

23 months

SF-36 physical pain: 80.4 vs. 61.8, difference 18.6, 95% 12.8 to 24.3

SF-36 physical functioning (0-100): 87.6 vs. 65.0, difference 22.6, 95% 15.0 to 30.1

SF-36 general health: 86.3 vs. 63.1, difference 23.2, 95% 17.3 to 29.1

SF-36 mental health: 91.0 vs. 58.8, difference 32.2, 95% 27.4 to 37.0)

Monticone 2014

3 months

Duration of pain: 15 vs. 14 months

Fair

A. Multidisciplinary rehabilitation (n=10), 16 sessions over 8 weeks (total 16 hours)

B. Exercise (n=10)

A vs. B

Age: 59 vs. 57 years

Female: 7% vs. 4%

Baseline function (0-100 ): 26 vs. 24

Baseline pain (0-10 ): 5 vs. 4

A vs. B

3 months

(0-100): 8 vs. 15, p=0.027

Pain (0-10 ): 2 vs. 3, p=1.0

A vs. B

3 months

SF-36 bodily pain (0-100): 65 vs. 55, p=0.261

SF-36 general health (0-100): 71 vs. 55, p=0.018

SF-36 social function (0-100): 81 vs. 61, p=0.001

SF-36 emotional role (0-100): 77 vs. 57, p=0.007

SF-36 mental health (0-100): 88 vs. 67, p=0.001

Nicholas, 1991

11 months

Duration of pain: 7 years

Poor

A. Multidisciplinary rehabilitation (cognitive treatment) (n=10)

B. Multidisciplinary rehabilitation (behavioral treatment) (n=10)

C. Multidisciplinary rehabilitation (cognitive treatment and relaxation treatment) (n=8)

D. Multidisciplinary rehabilitation (behavioral treatment and relaxation training) (n=9)

E. Exercise + attention control (psychologist-led group discussions) (n=10)

F. Exercise (n=11)

For all multidisciplinary rehabilitation interventions, 19 sessions over 5 weeks (total 21.5 hours)

Overall

Age: 41 years

Female: 51%

A vs. B vs. C vs. D vs. E vs. F

Baseline function, (0-100 Sickness Impact Profile): 37.13 vs. 34.24 vs. 33.41 vs. 20.53 vs. 27.12 vs. 28.06 Baseline pain (0-5 categorical scale): 2.78 vs. 2.96 vs. 3.80 vs. 2.27 vs. 2.84 vs. 2.77

A vs. B vs. C vs. D vs. E vs. F

5 months

Sickness Impact Profile (0-100): 24.42 (11.78) vs. 15.44 (14.12) vs. 25.69 (8.50) vs. 14.86 (9.08) vs. 19.40 (6.89) vs. 29.78 (8.76)

Pain (0-5 categorical scale): 2.18 (0.55) vs. 1.87 (0.73) vs. 3.20 (0.93) vs. 2.22 (0.48) vs. 2.64 (0.90) vs. 3.18 (0.72)

11 months

Sickness Impact Profile (0-100): 23.85 (12.50) vs. 12.80 (8.62) vs. 20.77 (8.29) vs. 12.87 (6.68) vs. 18.94 (12.79) vs. 25.18 (8.08)

Pain (0-5 categorical scale): 2.56 (0.97) vs. 2.66 (1.06) vs. 3.30 (0.83) vs. 1.88 (0.65) vs. 2.70 (0.84) vs. 3.22 (0.69)

A vs. B vs. C vs. D vs. E vs. F

5 months

Spielberger State Anxiety Inventory (20-80): 57.17 (10.30) vs. 37.57 (12.92) vs. 55.71 (10.47) vs. 36.40 (6.28) vs. 41.13 (11.70) vs. 54.00 (12.03)

Beck Depression Inventory (0-63): 18.67 (9.01) vs. 8.14 (5.77) vs. 16.14 (3.80) vs. 9.00 (6.07) vs. 9.88 (5.46) vs. 19.17 (8.78)

Medication use (0-5): 1.50 (1.26) vs. 0.57 (0.73) vs. 1.86 (0.64) vs. 1.60 (1.02) vs. 1.50 (0.71) vs. 1.83 (1.07)

11 months

Spielberger State Anxiety Inventory (20-80): 42.83 (9.42) vs. 37.43 (12.26) vs. 47.17 (17.01) vs. 40.67 (11.81) vs. 46.56 (11.51) vs. 53.40 (18.78)

Beck Depression Inventory (0-63): 18.67 (10.04) vs. 8.00 (5.93) vs. 12.83 (6.69) vs. 13.17 (8.51) vs. 10.56 (5.21) vs. 17.60 (6.09)

Medication use (0-5): 1.17 (1.37) vs. 0.71 (0.88) vs. 1.67 (1.37) vs. 1.33 (0.75) vs. 1.44 (0.96) vs. 1.60 (1.49)

Nicholas, 1992

5 months

Duration of pain: 5.5 years

Fair

A. Multidisciplinary rehabilitation (n=10), 18 sessions over 5 weeks, (total 31.5 hours)

B. Exercise + attention control (psychologist-led group discussions) (n=10)

Overall

Age: 44 years

Female: 45%

A vs. B

Baseline function (0-100 Sickness Impact Profile): 30.87 vs. 32.10

Baseline pain (0-5 categorical scale): 3.13 vs. 2.84

A vs. B

5 months

Pain intensity (0-5 categorical scale): 2.89 (0.64) vs. 2.75 (1.11)

A vs. B

5 months

Beck Depression Inventory (0-63): 14.44 (5.98) vs. 18.50 (9.26)

Using medication: 44% vs. 88%

Roche, 2007, 2011

10.75 months

Duration of pain: >4 months

Fair

A. Multidisciplinary rehabilitation (n=68), 25 sessions over 5 weeks (total 150 hours)

B. Exercise therapy (n=64)

A vs. B

Age: 41 vs. 39 years

Female: 32% vs. 38%

Baseline function (0-100 Dallas Pain Questionnaire daily activities (0-100): 51.8 vs. 51 Baseline Pain (0-10 ): 4.7 vs. 4.5

A vs. B

10.75 months

Dallas Pain Questionnaire daily activities (0-100): 31.4 vs. 39.1, difference −7.7 (95% −16.15 to 0.75)

Pain (0-10 ): 2.9 vs. 3.5, difference −0.6 (95% −1.49 to 0.29)

A vs. B

10.75 months

Dallas Pain Questionnaire anxiety/depression (0-100): 21.9 vs. 25.5, difference −3.6 (95% −12.56 to 5.36)

Strand, 2001

11 months

Duration of pain: 10 vs. 9 years

Fair

A. Multidisciplinary rehabilitation (n=81), 20 sessions over 4 weeks (total 120 hours)

B. Usual Care (n=36)

A vs. B

Age: 45 vs. 42 years

Female: 59% vs. 64%

Baseline function (0-100 Disability Rating Index): 55.6 vs. 58.3 Baseline pain (0-100 ): 48.3 vs. 53.0

A vs. B

11 months

Disability Rating Index (0-100): −27.3 (95% −34 to −21) vs. −3.3 (95 % CI −10 to 14) vs. −16.4 (95% CI −26 to −7.3) vs. 0.2 (95% CI −14 to 14), difference −3.8 (95% CI −13.9 to 6.3)

Pain (0-100 ): −21.1 (95% −31 to −11) vs. −2.3 (95% CI −9.4 to 4.8) vs. −23.1 (95% CI −37 to 9.2) vs. 7.1 (95% CI −7.7 to 22), difference −1.0 (95% CI −11.7 to 9.6)

A vs. B

11 months

Working: 47% vs. 58% difference −11% (95% −8 to 30)

Tavafian, 2008

12 months

Duration of pain: 9 months

Poor

A. Multidisciplinary program (n=37), 5 sessions over 0.5 weeks (total hours unclear)

B. Medications (acetaminophen, and chlordiazepoxide) (n=37)

A vs. B

Age: 43 vs. 45 years

Female, %: 100 vs. 100 Baseline SF-36 Physical (0-100): 41.2 vs. 42.3

Baseline SF-36 Mental (0-100): 47.5 vs. 47.7

A vs. B

3 months

SF-36 Physical (0-100): 76.7 vs. 51.2, difference 25.5 (95% 14.69 to 36.31)

SF-36 MCS (0-100): 80.4 vs. 57.4, difference 23.0 (95% 10.78 to 35.22)

6 months

SF-36 PCS (0-100): 66.6 vs. 51.2, difference 15.4 (95% 2.35 to 28.45)

SF-36 MCS (0-100): 66.9 vs. 57.9, difference 9.0 (95% −3.88 to 21.88)

6 months

SF-36 PCS (0-100): 64.7 vs. 51.1, difference 13.6 (95% −1.48 to 28.68)

SF-36 MCS (0-100): 65.1 vs. 60.2, difference 4.9 (95% −7.57 to 17.37)

Turner, 1990

12 months

Duration of pain: 12.9 years

Poor

A. Multidisciplinary rehabilitation (n=24), 16 sessions over 2 weeks (total 32 hours)

B. Exercise (n=24)

Overall

Age: 44 years

Female: 48%

A vs. B

Baseline function (Sickness Impact Profile): 8.5 vs. 8.4

Baseline pain (0-78 MPQ): 25.5 vs. 19.4

A vs. B

6 months

Sickness Impact Profile (0-100): 4.5 vs. 6.3

McGill Pain Questionnaire Pain Rating Index (0-78): 13.3 vs. 15.7

12 months

Sickness Impact Profile (0-100): 4.8 vs. 4.7

McGill Pain Questionnaire Pain Rating Index (0-78): 18.2 vs. 14.9

A vs. B

6 months

Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale (0-60): 8.3 vs. 9.3

12 months

Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale (0-60): 10.0 vs. 9.3

van der Roer, 2008

10 months

Duration of pain: ~50 weeks

Fair

A. Multidisciplinary rehabilitation (n=60), 30 sessions over 10 weeks (total hours unclear)

B. Exercise (n=54)

A vs. B

Age: 42 vs. 42 years

Female: 55% vs. 48%

Baseline function (0-24): 11.6 vs. 12.1

Baseline pain (0-10 ): 6.2 vs. 5.9

A vs. B

4 months

(0-24): 7.4 vs. 7.7, adjusted difference 0.13 (95% −2.24 to 2.50)

Pain (0-10 ): 4.1 vs. 4.8, adjusted difference −0.97 (95% −1.88 to −0.06)

10 months

(0-24): 6.7 vs. 7.1, adjusted difference 0.06 (−2.22 to 2.34)

Pain (0-10 ): 3.9 vs. 4.6, adjusted difference −1.02 (−2.14 to 0.09)

A vs. B

4 months

Global Perceived Effect positive (%): 38.2% vs. 39.8%, OR 0.93 (95% 0.36 to 2.43)

10 months

Global Perceived Effect positive (%): 45.0% vs. 32.3%, OR 1.71 (95% 0.67 to 4.38)

Von Korff, 2005

22.5 months

Duration of pain: >3 months

Fair

A. Multidisciplinary rehabilitation (n=119), 4 sessions over 5 weeks (total 4 hours)

B. Usual care (n=121)

A vs. B

Age: 50 vs. 50 years

Female: 65% vs. 60%

Modified (0-23): 12.3 vs. 11.4 Baseline pain (0-10 ): 5.7 vs. 5.8

A vs. B

4.5 months

Function

Modified (0-23): 9.2 (6.6) vs. 10.1 (6.4), p=0.0003

>1/3 reduction in : 42.2% vs. 23.7%, adjusted OR 3.5, p=0.0007

Pain (0-10 ): 4.2 (2.0) vs. 4.7 (2.2), p=0.007

10.5 months

Modified (0-23): 8.4 vs. 9.1, p=0.0063

>1/3 reduction in : 44.6% vs. 22.7%, adjusted OR 2.1, p=0.03

Pain (0-10 ): 4.0 vs. 4.7, p=0.004

22.5 months

Modified (0-23): 8.1 vs. 9.1, p=0.0078

>1/3 reduction in : 49.4% vs. 37.0%, adjusted OR 1.8, p=0.08

Pain (0-10 ): 4.3 vs. 4.6, p=0.115

A vs. B

4.5 months

SF-36 Social Functioning (0-100): 74.4 vs. 73.6, p=0.26

SF-36 Mental Health (0-100): 70.3 vs. 69.5, p=0.23

10.5 months

SF-36 Social Functioning (0-100): 74.4 vs. 73.6, p=0.26

SF-36 Mental Health (0-100): 70.3 vs. 69.5, p=0.23

22.5 months

SF-36 Social Functioning (0-100): 76.7 vs. 76.3, p=0.28

SF-36 Mental Health (0-100): 71.0 vs. 72.4, p=0.98

= activity of daily living; = confidence interval; LBO = Low Back Outcome Score; = low back pain; MCS = Mental Component Summary; MPQ = McGill Pain Questionnaire; = not reported; = Numerical Rating Scale; = nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug; = Oswestry Disability Index; PCS = Physical Component Summary; = Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire; SF-36 = Short-Form 36Q; = visual analog scale

a

Unless otherwise noted, followup time is calculated from the end of the treatment period

From: Results

Cover of Noninvasive Nonpharmacological Treatment for Chronic Pain: A Systematic Review Update
Noninvasive Nonpharmacological Treatment for Chronic Pain: A Systematic Review Update [Internet].
Comparative Effectiveness Review, No. 227.
Skelly AC, Chou R, Dettori JR, et al.

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

External link. Please review our privacy policy.