Table 22Chronic neck pain: manual therapies (massage)

Author, Year, Followup, Pain Duration, Study QualityInterventionPopulationFunction and Pain OutcomesOther Outcomes

Pach, 2018

1 and 3 months

Duration of pain: mean 11.2 to 11.5 years

Fair

[New trial]

A. Tunia massage (n=46) Two 30-minute sessions/week for 3 weeks (6 sessions total). Authors report high adherence but data is not provided.

B. No intervention waitlist (n=46)

A vs. B

Age: 46 vs. 45 years

Female: 89.1% vs. 84.8%

Baseline (0-50): 45.5 vs. 46.5

Baseline NPDS (0-100): 42.7 vs. 42.7

Baseline pain during previous 7 days (0-100 ): 55.8 vs. 59.5

A vs. B

3 months

: 36.6 (95% 33.5 to 39.6) vs. 46.1 (95% CI 42.9 to 49.3), adjusted difference −9.6 (95% CI −14.0 to −5.1)

NPDS: 30.2 (95% 25.8 to 34.6) vs. 42.3 (95% CI 37.7 to 46.8), adjusted difference −12.1 (95% CI −18.4 to −5.8)

Mean score during previous 7 days: 30.1 (95% 23.8 to 36.4) vs. 48.1 (95% CI 41.5 to 54.6), adjusted difference −17.9 (95% CI −27.1 to −8.8);

A vs. B

3 months

SF-12 Physical health (0-100): 48.1 (95% 45.8 to 50.3) vs. 42.4 (95% CI 40.1 to 44.7), adjusted difference 5.6 (95% CI 2.4 to 8.9)

SF-12 Mental health (0-100): 48.3 (95% 45.4 to 51.1) vs. 45.7 (95% CI 42.8 to 48.5), adjusted difference 2.6 (95% CI −1.4 to 6.6)

Proportion of patients using medication for neck pain during the previous 4 weeks: 0.4 (95% 0.2 to 0.6) vs. 0.5 (95% CI 0.3 to 0.7), adjusted difference −0.1 (95% CI −0.4 to 0.1)

Rudolfsson, 2014

6 months

Duration of pain: median 84 to 123 months

Fair

A. Massage, classical (n=36): upper body including the back, neck and shoulders.

B. Neck coordination exercise (n=36): performed with a newly developed training device designed to improve the fine movement control of the cervical spine.

C. Strength training (n=36): isometric and dynamic exercises targeting the neck and shoulder regions.

All 3 interventions consisted of 22 individually supervised single treatment sessions, 30 min each, distributed over 11 weeks

A vs. B vs. C

Age: 51 vs. 52 vs. 51 years

Female: 100% vs. 100% vs. 100%

Baseline pain (0-10 ), 5 vs. 6 vs. 6 (median)

Baseline : 26 vs. 29 vs. 31

SF-36 PCS (0-100): 43 vs. 39 vs. 39 (median)

SF-36 MCS (0-100): 49 vs. 52 vs. 47 (median)

A vs. B:

6 months

Pain (0-10): 4.0 vs. 3.8, difference 0.2 (95% −0.8 to 1.2)

A vs. C:

6 months

Pain (0-10): No data given at 6 month, however, authors state no difference among A, B or C.

Sherman, 2009

2.5 and 6.5 months

Duration of pain >1 year: 81%

Fair

A. Massage (n=32): Swedish and clinical techniques and self-care recommendations; 10 massage treatments over a 10-week period

B. Self-care book: (n=32) information on potential causes of neck pain, neck-related headaches, whiplash, recommended strengthening exercises, body mechanics and posture, conventional treatment, complementary therapies for neck pain, and first aid for intermittent flare-ups.

A vs. B

Age: 47 vs. 46 years

Female: 69% vs. 69%

White: 87% vs. 81%

Smoker: 9% vs. 6%

Pain lasted > 1 year: 81% vs. 81%

Baseline (0-50): 14.2 vs. 14.2S

A vs. B

2.5 months

, % ≥5 points: 39% vs. 14%, 2.7 (95% 0.99 to 7.5)

(0-50): difference −2.3 (95% −4.7 to 0.15)

6.5 months

, % ≥5 points: 57% vs. 31%, 1.8 (95% 1.0 to 3.5)

: difference: −1.9 (95% −4.4 to 0.6)

A vs. B

2.5 months

Bothersome score (0-10): difference −1.2 (95% −2.5 to 0.1)

Bothersome improvement ≥30%: 55% vs. 25%, 2.1 (95% 1.04 to 4.2)

SF-36 PCS (0-100): 52.8 vs. 53.3, p=0.982

SF-36 MCS (0-100): 45.9 vs. 45.3, p=0.444

6.5 months

Bothersome score: difference −0.14 (95% −1.5 to 1.2)

Bothersome improvement ≥30%: 43% vs. 39%, 1.1 (95% 0.6 to 2.0)

SF-36 PCS and MCS: data not given, no statistical difference

Medication use: No change in group A, 14% increase in group B

= confidence interval; = Neck Disability Index; = not reported; = numeric rating scale; SF-36 MCS = Short-Form 36 Questionnaire Mental Component Scale; SF-36 PCS = Short-Form 36 Questionnaire Physical Component Scale = Visual Analog Scale

a

Unless otherwise noted, followup time is calculated from the end of the treatment period.

From: Results

Cover of Noninvasive Nonpharmacological Treatment for Chronic Pain: A Systematic Review Update
Noninvasive Nonpharmacological Treatment for Chronic Pain: A Systematic Review Update [Internet].
Comparative Effectiveness Review, No. 227.
Skelly AC, Chou R, Dettori JR, et al.

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

External link. Please review our privacy policy.