Table 23Chronic neck pain: mind-body practices

Author, Year, Followup, Pain Duration, Study QualityInterventionPopulationFunction and Pain OutcomesOther Outcomes

Lansinger, 2007

6 and 12 months

Pain duration: >5 years, 45%

Poor

A. Qigong (n=72): 10-12 group sessions of 10-15 people done 1-2 times per week over 3 months. Sessions were 1 hour and consisted of information of the philosophy of medical qigong followed by exercises based on the Biyun method

B. Exercise (n=67): 10-12 sessions 1-2 times per week over 3 months. Sessions were 1 hour and individualized to target 30%-70% of a person’s maximal voluntary capacity, with exercises aiming to maintain/increase circulation, endurance, and strength.

All patients: Ergonomic instructions and a pamphlet containing written information on neck pain

A vs. B

Age: 45 vs. 43

Female: 73% vs. 67%

Physical activity:

No to light exercise: 67% vs. 65%

Med to hard exercise: 33% vs. 35%

Baseline NDI (0-100), median: 26 vs. 22

Baseline pain (VAS, 0-10), median: 45 vs. 39

A vs. B

6 months

NDI, median: 22 vs. 18, p>0.05

Neck pain VAS (0-10), median: 2.6 vs. 2.3, p>0.05

12 months

NDI, median: 22 vs. 18, p>0.05

Neck pain VAS, median: 2.8 vs. 2.1, p>0.05

NR

MacPherson, 2015, Essex 2017

ATLAS trial

1, 7, and 12 months

Duration of pain, 7 years

Fair

[Essex – New publication reporting healthcare utilization]

A. Alexander Technique group (n=172): up to 20 one-to-one lessons of 30 minutes’ duration (600 minutes total) plus usual care, delivered weekly, with the option of being delivered twice per week initially and every 2 weeks later.

B. Usual care (n=172) including general and neck pain–specific treatments routinely provided to primary care patients, such as prescribed medications and visits to physical therapists and other healthcare professionals.

Treatment was 12 sessions over 5 months lasting 50 minutes.

A vs. B

Age: 52 vs. 54 years

Female: 69% vs. 69%

White: 93% vs. 89%

Employed: 61% vs. 62%

P

Baseline NPQ (0-100%): 39.6 vs. 40.5

A vs. B

1 month

NPQ: 35.4 vs. 40.9, difference −5.6 (95% CI −8.3 to −2.8)

7 months

NPQ: 37.1 vs. 41.0, difference −3.9 (95% CI −6.9 to −1.0)

A vs. B

1 month

SF-12v2 physical: data NR, p=NS

SF-12v2 mental: data NR, p=NS

7 months

SF-12v2 physical: 0.68 (95% CI −1.1 to 2.4), p=0.44

SF-12v2 mental: 1.76 (95% CI 0.2 to 3.4), p=0.033

12 months

Mean utilization of NHS resources: p>0.05, data NR

Mean utilization of private healthcare (additional sessions):

-

Acupuncture: 0.2 vs. 0.1, p>0.05

-

Alexander Technique: 0.5 vs. 0, p<0.05

-

Other private appointments: 1.0 vs. 2.1, p>0.05

Mean days off work due to neck pain: 1.4 vs. 2.3, p>0.05

Mean total NHS cost (2012/13 UK £):1200 (95% CI 1000 to 1400) vs. 484 (95% CI 371 to 598), adjusted difference, 667 (95% CI 472 to 896); p<0.001

Seferiadis, 2015

3 months

Pain duration: 9.5 years

Fair

A. Basic body awareness therapy (n=57): 1.5 hour sessions twice a week for 10 weeks. Sessions consisted of exercises based on activities of daily living, meditation, and tai chi inspired exercises aiming to improve posture and increase efficient movement patterns

B. Exercise (n=56): 1.5 hour sessions twice a week for 10 weeks. Sessions consisted of 45 minutes of muscle strengthening, 15 minutes of stretching, and 20 minutes of progressive muscle relaxation

A vs. B

Age: 47 vs. 49

Female: 66% vs. 77%

WAD classification:

1: 0% vs. 2%

2: 23% vs. 28%

3: 77% vs. 70%

Baseline NDI (0-50): 20 vs. 18.8

A vs. B

3 months

NDI: Difference from baseline −2.0 (95% CI −3.5 to −0.5) vs. −1 (95% CI −2.5 to 0.4), p>0.05

A vs. B

3 months

SF-36v2 physical functioning (0-100): Difference from baseline 7.1 (95% CI 3.7 to 11.4) vs. 0.5 (95% CI −3.2 to 4.1), p>0.05

SF-36 role-physical(0-100): Difference from baseline 17.5 (95% CI 5.9 to 29) vs. 19 (95% CI 9.3 to 28.6), p>0.05

SF-36 bodily pain(0-100): Difference from baseline 12.2 (95% CI 6.9 to 17.6) vs. 4.9 (95% CI −0.1 to 9.8), p=0.044

SF-36 general health(0-100): Difference from baseline 7.5 (95% CI 2.4 to 12.6) vs. 4.5 (95% CI −0.1 to 9), p>0.05

SF-36 vitality(0-100): Difference from baseline 7.3 (95% CI 1.0 to13.6) vs. 5.6 (95% CI −0.5 to 11.6), p>0.05

SF-36 social functioning(0-100): Difference from baseline 13.3 (95% CI 6.6 to 19.9 vs. 3.5 (95% CI −3 to 9.9), p=0.037

SF-36 role-emotional (0-100): Difference from baseline 9.3 (95% CI −2.3 to 21) vs. 4 (95% CI −8.3 to 16.4), p>0.05

SF-36 mental health (0-100): Difference from baseline 2.8 (95% CI −2 to 7.6) vs. 1.2 (95% CI −3.6 to 5.9), p>0.05

CI = confidence interval; NDI = Neck Disability Index; NHS = National Health Service; NPQ = Northwick Park Neck Pain Questionnaire; NR = not reported; SF-12 = Short-Form 12 Questionaire; SF-36 =Short-Form 36 Questionnaire; UK = United Kingdom; VAS = visual analog scale; WAD = Whiplash Associated Disorders

a

Unless otherwise noted, followup time is calculated from the end of the treatment period.

b

12 month data are health utilization data only from a subset of patients from the ATLAS trial (publication Essex 2017) who had full economic data N=293 (57%) [to include the acupuncture arm; details in the Acupuncture section]; no demographic data provided for the subset

c

Across all appointment types and prescription medications; National Health Services (NHS) appointment types to include, general practitioner appointments, physiotherapy visits, hospital outpatient visits, accident and emergency admissions, hospital day case admissions, other hospital admissions. NHS prescription medication included all prescription medication and prescription items specifically for neck pain. Neck pain prescriptions t-test comparing usual care and acupuncture borderline significance (p=0.06).

d

For baseline NHS healthcare costs and practice size.

From: Results

Cover of Noninvasive Nonpharmacological Treatment for Chronic Pain: A Systematic Review Update
Noninvasive Nonpharmacological Treatment for Chronic Pain: A Systematic Review Update [Internet].
Comparative Effectiveness Review, No. 227.
Skelly AC, Chou R, Dettori JR, et al.

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

External link. Please review our privacy policy.