FROM:
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2006 (Jan); 29 (1): 513 ~ FULL TEXT
Xue-Jun Song, MD, PhD, Qiang Gan, MS, Jun-Li Cao, MD,
Zheng-Bei Wang, MD, Ronald L. Rupert, DC, MS
Department of Neurobiology,
Parker College Research Institute,
Dallas, TX 75229, USA.
OBJECTIVE: To document potential mediating effects of the Activator-assisted spinal manipulative therapy (ASMT) on pain and hyperalgesia after acute intervertebral foramen (IVF) inflammation.
METHODS: The IVF inflammation was mimicked by in vivo delivery of inflammatory soup directly into the L5 IVF in adult male Sprague-Dawley rats. Thermal hyperalgesia and mechanical allodynia were determined by the shortened latency of foot withdrawal to radiant heat and von Frey filament stimulation to the hind paw, respectively. Intracellular recordings were obtained in vitro from L5 dorsal root ganglion (DRG) somata. DRG inflammation was examined by observation of the appearance and hematoxylin and eosin staining. ASMT was applied to the spinous process of L4, L5, and L6. A series of 10 adjustments were initiated 24 hours after surgery and subsequently applied daily for 7 consecutive days and every other day during the second week.
RESULTS: (1) ASMT applied on L5, L6, or L5 and L6 spinous process significantly reduced the severity and duration of thermal and mechanical hyperalgesia produced by the IVF inflammation. However, ASMT applied on L4 did not affect the response in rats with IVF inflammation or the controls; (2) electrophysiological studies showed that hyperexcitability of the DRG neurons produced by IVF inflammation was significantly reduced by ASMT; (3) pathological studies showed that manifestations of the DRG inflammation, such as the increased vascularization and satellitosis, were significantly reduced 2 to 3 weeks after ASMT.
CONCLUSIONS: These studies show that Activator-assisted spinal manipulative therapy (ASMT) can significantly reduce the severity and shorten the duration of pain and hyperalgesia caused by lumbar IVF inflammation. This effect may result from ASMT-induced faster elimination of the inflammation and recovery of excitability of the inflamed DRG neurons by improving blood and nutrition supplement to the DRG within the affected IVF. Manipulation of a specific spinal segment may play an important role in optimizing recovery from lesions involving IVF inflammation.
Key Indexing Terms: Spinal Manipulation, Hyperalgesia, Inflammation
From the FULL TEXT Article:
Introduction
Lumbar intervertebral foramen (IVF) inflammation appears to play a critical role in the pathogenesis of low back pain. [13] This process can produce injury or disease to the structures and tissues within and/or adjacent to the IVF. [410] After inflammation or nerve injury or dorsal root ganglion (DRG) compression, the chemical factors such as cytokines, nerve growth factors, inflammatory mediators, and other substances release and activate and/or change the properties of DRG neurons and spinal dorsal horn neurons and contribute to hyperalgesia. [4, 5, 7, 1115] Nerve-injured or DRG-compressed sensory neurons, in vitro, exhibit enhanced responses to inflammatory mediators. [4] To further understand the mechanisms of low back pain due to IVF inflammation, we have recently developed an animal model of IVF inflammation produced by in vivo delivery of inflammatory mediators directly into the IVF at L5. [16, 17] Rats with L5 IVF inflammation exhibit measurable pain and hyperalgesia and the primary sensory neurons become more excitable.
The mechanisms for the clinical effects of spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) are poorly understood but are thought to be related to mechanical, neurophysiological, and reflexogenic processes. [18, 19] In addition to traditional manual SMT, instruments such as the Activator Adjusting Instrument (AAI) have also been used to produce spinal mobilization. [20] The AAI was developed to precisely control the speed, force, and direction of the adjustive thrusts so that one may produce a safe, reliable, and controlled force to adjust osseous spinal structures. [21, 22] The AAI evolved in response to current knowledge in biomechanical and neurophysiological categories of investigation. Under the biomechanical model, issues such as tissue compliance (stiffness), response to input force (impedance), and natural frequency resonance of the spine were explored. In neurophysiological investigations, threshold frequencies and minimal forces required for stimulation of joint mechanoreceptors were investigated. [20, 23, 24]
The purpose of this study was to document potential mediating effects of SMT as performed using the AAI on pain and hyperalgesia produced by lumbar IVF inflammation in a small animal model with outcomes being assessed through behavioral, electrophysiological, and pathological approaches.
Discussion
The present study investigated the effects of instrumented assisted SMT on pain and hyperalgesia produced by acute IVF inflammation in L5 in a small animal model by means of behavioral, electrophysiological, and pathological approaches. We found that the AAI-assisted SMT applied to the IVF inflamed spinous process can significantly reduce the severity and shorten the duration of pain and hyperalgesia, reduce the hyperexcitability of the DRG neurons, and alleviate inflammation of the DRG neurons after the IVF inflammation.
Inflammatory responses play key roles in behavioral hyperalgesia and hyperexcitability of DRG cells in inflammatory pain as well as in neuropathic pain. [711] Intervertebral foramen inflammation is one of the main reasons for low back pain. After IVF inflammation, the chemical factors such as cytokines, nerve growth factors, inflammatory mediators, and other substances release and activate and/or change the properties of DRG neurons and spinal dorsal horn neurons as well as increase their excitability and therefore contribute to pain and/or hyperalgesia. [4, 5, 7] In the present study, injection of the inflammatory mediators into the IVF directly produces acute inflammation to the constituents within the IVF, that is, DRG, nerve root, and blood and lymph vessels, and, furthermore, may produce ischemia and compromise the delivery of oxygen and nutrients. Interestingly, our studies show that ASMT can significantly alleviate the symptoms and shorten the duration of pain and hyperalgesia caused by the IVF inflammation. Furthermore, by means of electrophysiological and pathological assessments, our studies showed that the faster relief of pain and hyperalgesia after ASMT may result from the faster recovery of hyperexcitability of the sensory neurons and elimination of the DRG inflammation.
Although the mechanism of action of this intervention is unknown, there are numerous possibilities. It was found that the lumbar vertebrae experienced an axial displacement, posteroanterior shear displacement, and rotational displacement at the upper spinal segment levels. Coupled spinal motion was also detected in more than just the vertebra receiving a direct thrust. [20] In our present study, the AAI was applied to the small animal with IVF inflammation and produced significant treatment effects on the pain and hyperalgesia. Based on the findings of research on Activator adjustments on a human spine, the increased movement of the affected intervertebral joints (facets) and the coupled spinal motion may contribute to the treatment effect of Activator via improving the blood and nutrition supply to the DRG within the affected IVF.
In addition, chiropractic adjustments delivered by the AAI may normalize articular afferent input to the central nervous system with subsequent recovery of muscle tone, joint mobility, and sympathetic activity. [25, 26] It was also hypothesized that a chiropractic lumbar thrust would produce sufficient force to coactivate all of the mechanically sensitive receptor types, [27] and adjustments made with the AAI are thought to accomplish the same task. [28] An Activator adjustment may have the capacity to coactivate type III, high-threshold mechanoreceptors. Both types III and IV receptors in diarthrodial joints, as well as type II in paravertebral muscles and tendons, are responsive to vertebral displacement. [29] In addition, Activator adjustment may be effective by activating the receptors in the spinal cord and some of the ascending and descending signaling pathways that involve pain modulation. [30] These may contribute to the mechanisms underlying the treatment effects of the AAI.
The importance of specificity as it relates to which spinal segment or segments are manipulated has been a longstanding debate within the chiropractic profession. Most treatment techniques emphasize the importance of manipulation of a specific vertebral segment. [31] The general belief is that specific adjustments are therapeutically superior to general mobilization. Recent studies suggest several problems with specific chiropractic adjustments. First, chiropractors appear to be unable to accurately palpate and identify the spinal segment they often seek to target. [32] Secondly, due to the size of the contact points on the physician's hand, there is a question regarding the ability to deliver specific force to the specific area of the spine where it is intended. The present studies are important in addressing the issue of treatment specificity. However, through literature reviews, we could not locate evidence to support or refute that primary question of whether making contact on specific vertebrae is in fact important. This research is believed to be the first demonstration that reduced hyperalgesia from DRG inflammation was significant in animals where manipulation included the specific lumbar vertebrae and not in animals that were treated only at an adjacent vertebral segment. This study suggests that specificity was an important treatment variable in reducing hyperalgesia in this DRG inflammation model.
Conclusion
The present study shows that ASMT can significantly reduce the severity and shorten the duration of pain and hyperalgesia caused by lumbar IVF inflammation. This effect may result from the adjustment-induced faster elimination of the inflammation and recovery of excitability of the inflamed DRG neurons. The ASMT may produce more movement of the affected intervertebral joints (facets), which may improve blood and nutrition supply to the DRG within the affected IVF. Our study also suggests that treating a specific vertebral level may be an important variable in chiropractic practice.
Acknowledgement
The authors thank Dr Cheryl Hawk for her comments on the manuscript, Dr Charlotte Watts for her technical support, and Maria Dominguez for her assistance in laboratory management. The Activator was kindly provided by Dr Arlan W. Fuhr (Activator Methods International).
References:
Devor, M.
The pathophysiology of damaged peripheral nerves.
in: PD Wall, R Melzack (Eds.) Text book of pain. 3rd ed.
Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh; 1994: 79100
Sen, O, Aydin, MV, Bagdatoglu, C, Ertorer, ME,
Bolat, FA, Yalcin, O et al.
Can E-selectin be a reliable marker of inflammation in lumbar disc disease?.
Neurosurg Rev. 2005; 28: 214217
Brisby, H, Olmarker, K, Larsson, K, Nutu, M, and Rydevik, B.
Proinflammatory cytokines in cerebrospinal fluid and serum in patients
with disc herniation and sciatica.
Eur Spine J. 2002; 11: 6266
Song, XJ, Zhang, JM, Hu, SJ, and LaMotte, RH.
Somata of nerve-injured neurons exhibit enhanced responses
to inflammatory mediators.
Pain. 2003; 104: 701709
Song, XJ, Xu, DS, Vizcarra, C, and Rupert, RL.
Onset and recovery of hyperalgesia and hyperexcitability of sensory neurons
following intervertebral foramen volume reduction and restoration.
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2003; 26: 426436
Ji, RR and Woolf, CJ.
Neuronal plasticity and signal transduction in nociceptive neurons:
implications for the initiation and maintenance of pathological pain.
Neurobiol Dis. 2001; 8: 110
Neumann, S, Doubell, TP, Leslie, T, and Woolf, CJ.
Inflammatory pain hypersensitivity mediated by phenotypic switch in
myelinated primary sensory neurons.
Nature. 1996; 384: 360364
Lu, X and Richardson, PM.
Responses of macrophages in rat dorsal root ganglia
following peripheral nerve injury.
J Neurocytol. 1993; 22: 334341
Cui, JG, Holmin, S, Mathiesen, T, Meyerson, BA, and Linderoth, B.
Possible role of inflammatory mediators in tactile hypersensitivity
in rat models of mononeuropathy.
Pain. 2000; 88: 239248
Leach, RA.
Vertebral subluxation complex hypothesis.
in: RA Leach (Ed.) The chiropractic theories:
principles and clinical applications. 3rd ed.
Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore; 1994: 201230
Wagner, R and Myers, RR.
Endoneurial injection of TNF-alpha produces neuropathic pain behaviors.
Neuroreport. 1996; 7: 103111
Waxman, SG, Kocsis, JD, and Black, JA.
Type III sodium channel mRNA is expressed in embryonic but not adult
spinal sensory neurons, and is reexpressed following axotomy.
J Neurophysiol. 1994; 72: 466470
Song, XJ, Hu, SJ, Greenquist, K, and LaMotte, RH.
Mechanical and thermal cutaneous hyperalgesia and ectopic neuronal
discharge in rats with chronically compressed dorsal root ganglia.
J Neurophysiol. 1999; 82: 33473358
Song, XJ, Vizcarra, C, Xu, DS, Rupert, RL, and Wong, ZN.
Hyperalgesia and neural excitability following injuries to the
peripheral and central branches of axon and somata of dorsal root ganglion neurons.
J Neurophysiol. 2003; 89: 21852193
Song, XJ, Wang, ZB, Gan, Q, and Walters, ET.
cAMP and cGMP contribute to sensory neuron hyperexcitability and hyperalgesia
in rats with dorsal root ganglia compression.
J Neurophysiol. 2005; 95: 479492
Song, XJ, Gan, Q, Wang, ZB, and Rupert, RL.
Hyperalgesia and hyperexcitability of sensory neurons induced by local
application of inflammatory mediators: an animal model of acute lumbar
intervertebral foramen inflammation.
in: Proceedings (Abstract Viewer/Itinerary Planner) of the 34th Annual Meeting
of the Society for Neuroscience; 2004 Nov;
San Diego, CA. Society for Neuroscience,
Washington, DC; 2004: 30
Song, XJ, Gan, Q, Wang, ZB, and Rupert, RL.
Lumbar intervertebral foramen inflammationinduced hyperalgesia and
hyperexcitability of sensory neurons in the rat. ([abstract])
FASEB J. 2004; 1616
Bronfort, G, Haas, M, and Evans, R.
The clinical effectiveness of spinal manipulation for musculoskeletal conditions.
in: S Haldeman (Ed.) Principles and practice of chiropractic. 3rd ed.
McGraw Hill, New York; 2005: 147165
Vernon, H.
The treatment of headache, neurologic, and non-musculoskeletal
disorders by spinal manipulation.
in: S Haldeman (Ed.) Principles and practice of chiropractic. 3rd ed.
McGraw Hill, New York; 2005: 167182
Fuhr, AW and Menke, JM.
Activator methods chiropractic technique.
Top Clin Chiropr. 2002; 9: 3043
Richard, DR.
The activator story: development of a new concept in chiropractic.
Chiropr J Aust. 1994; 24: 2832
Osterbauer, P, Fuhr, AW, and Keller, TS.
Description and analysis of activator methods chiropractic technique.
in: DJ Lawrence (Ed.) Advances in chiropractic.
Mosby, St. Louis; 1995: 471520
Fuhr, AW and Smith, DB.
Accuracy of piezoelectric accelerometers measuring displacement of a
spinal adjusting instrument.
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1986; 9: 1521
Smith, DB, Fuhr, AW, and Davis, BP.
Skin accelerometer displacement and relative bone movement of adjacent
vertebrae in response to chiropractic percussion thrusts.
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1989; 12: 2637
Keller, TS.
In vivo transient vibration assessment of the normal human thoracolumbar spine.
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2000; 23: 521530
Henderson, CNR.
Three neurophysiological theories on the chiropractic subluxation.
in: MI Gatterman (Ed.) Foundation of chiropractic: subluxation.
Mosby, St. Louis; 1995: 225233
Gillette, RG.
A speculative argument for the coactivation of diverse somatic receptor
populations by forceful chiropractic adjustments.
Man Med. 1987; 3: 114
Nathan, M and Keller, TS.
Measurement and analysis of the in vivo posteroanterior impulse response
of the human thoracolumbar spine: a feasibility study.
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1994; 17: 431441
Brodeur, R.
The audible release associated with joint manipulation.
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1995; 18: 155164
Song, XJ and Rupert, RL.
The central projections of spinal receptors.
in: S Haldeman (Ed.) Principles and practice of chiropractic. 3rd ed.
McGraw Hill, New York; 2005: 269288
Cooperstein, R, Gleberzon, BJ, and Mootz, RD.
in: Technique systems in chiropractic.
Churchill Livingstone, New York; 2004: 155171
Perle, SM.
The illusion of specificity.
J Am Chiropr Assoc. 2002; 39: 3031
Return to SUBLUXATION
Since 2-26-2016
|