FROM:
J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2011 (Mar); 55 (1): 32-39 ~ FULL TEXT
Brynne Stainsby BA, DC, Scott Howitt BA, CK, CSCS, DC, FCCSS(C), FCCRS(C),
Jason Porr BSc
Graduate Student,
Clinical Sciences,
Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College,
6100 Leslie Street,
Toronto, Ontario M2H 3J1. ext. 208
OBJECTIVE: To detail the presentation of three health care workers diagnosed with sudden acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) who later presented to a CMCC teaching clinic with neuromusculoskeletal sequelae and underwent conservative treatments. This case series aims to inform practitioners of the potential pathogenesis of these neuromuscular complaints and describes their treatment in a chiropractic practice.
CLINICAL FEATURES: Three patients presented with a variety of neurological, muscular and joint findings. Conservative treatment was aimed at decreasing hypertonic muscles, increasing joint mobility, and improving ability to perform activities of daily living.
INTERVENTION AND OUTCOME: The conservative treatment approach utilized in these cases involved spinal manipulative therapy, soft tissue therapy, modalities, and rehabilitation. Outcome measures included subjective pain ratings, disability indices, and return to work.
CONCLUSION: Three patients previously diagnosed with SARS presented with neuromusculoskeletal complaints and subjectively experienced intermittent relief of pain and improvement in disability status after conservative treatments.
From the Full-Text Article:
Discussion
The number of chiropractors treating patients previously
diagnosed with SARS is unknown, however, with over
8000 cases reported during the global outbreak, it is certainly
possible these patients may present in a chiropractic
office. Readers should be aware of the limited body
of knowledge regarding neuromusculoskeletal complaints
associated with SARS and therefore, the difficulties in
the determination of prognosis. Furthermore, other viral
infections may present as neuromuscular disorders, and
practitioners should be educated regarding the potential
mechanisms of pathogenesis including direct action (viral
myositis or neuritis), inflammatory reaction (immune
mimicry), or via a systemic inflammatory response syndrome. [12]
Myopathy
Muscle weakness and an elevated serum CK level have
been documented in patients infected by the SARS-CoV,
however, little is understood about the mechanism of injury.
[2, 10] Though clinical trials to examine the pathogenesis
of SARS-associated myopathy are currently not available
in the literature, the findings of case reports and series
suggest it may be a common sequela of the infection. [2, 10] A number of potential causes have been identified and
warrant further investigation.
Cachetic myopathy has been suspected due to disuse
following bed rest. [2, 5, 13] Patients commonly suffered from
acute respiratory failure during the second phase of SARS
and required bed rest which may have lead to deconditioning
and muscle wasting. [5] While disuse is likely to play a
role in muscle atrophy, it does not fully explain the necrosis
and histochemical changes reported in the literature.
Due to the number of patients presenting with myalgia
and an elevated serum CK level, a viral-induced myositis
has been suggested. [10] During in situ hybridization and viral
culture for SARS-CoV, the negative fi ndings suggest
the necrosis may be due to cytokine release which caused
immune damage rather than viral infection of the skeletal
muscles. [13] This theory was reinforced by the absence of
viral particles observed during electron microscopy. [13]
The use of systemic corticosteroids as treatment for
acute respiratory failure during the second phase of SARS
has also been suggested as a potential contribution to the
development of myopathy. [2, 5] Corticosteroids have been
purported to alter electrical excitability of muscle fi bres,
decrease the number of thick filaments, and/or inhibit protein
synthesis. [5] Interestingly, patients who did not receive
steroid therapy were not found to experience myofi ber
atrophy, further indicating the potential role of corticosteroid
therapy in the development of myopathy. [2] It must be
noted however, authors believe three to 10 days of steroid
therapy (typical dose) alone was not adequate to explain
the pathogenesis of myopathy, and stressed the need for
investigation of other (or combined) causes. [2]
One such cause may be the development of critical
illness myopathy (CIM), an acquired myopathy following
acute or chronic disease. This disorder has frequently
been observed in conditions requiring mechanical ventilation
and high-dose steroid treatment. [2] It is believed to be
caused by activated leukocytes infiltrating skeletal muscle
and causing the release of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines,
leading to axonal degeneration with preservation
of the myelin sheath. [13] This disorder is characterized by
a normal cerebrospinal fluid protein level, preservation
of cranial nerve and autonomic function and a lack of
lymphocyte infiltration of neurons. [13] Clinically, patients
maintain sensation (via peripheral nerves), and testing reveals
elevated serum CK and decreased thick filaments
with fi ber atrophy and necrosis on biopsy. [2, 13]
Neuropathy
Similarly, neurologic manifestations of SARS have not
been well described in the literature. [12] A relationship between
the SARS-CoV and neurological symptoms has not
been established; it is currently unknown if the virus has
the potential to damage peripheral nerves directly or if the
observed neuropathy is an immune mediated process. [12]
Critical illness polyneuropathy (CIP) has been suggested
most commonly to explain the neurologic presentation
following a diagnosis of SARS. [11, 13] CIP develops
as an acute neuropathy during severe illness and typically
remits when the underlying illness is controlled. [11] An illness
such as SARS could have produced elevated levels of
proinfl ammatory cytokines, platelet activating factor, arachidonic
acid, free radicals and proteases. [13] These factors
could create a neurotoxic environment and lead to neuropathy.
[13] If acute, practitioners must ensure the underlying
systemic inflammatory response (sepsis) is medically
managed and other causes (neurotoxic drugs, poisoning
and nutritional deficiencies) are ruled out as there is no
specific treatment for CIP. [13] Prognosis is unknown and
may vary depending on the severity of the disease. It has
been suggested that symptoms (especially weakness) may
persist in those patients with a long duration of sepsis or
those requiring long-term care in intensive care, however,
actual durations of illness or treatment are not defined. [13]
Chao et al. reported rapid improvement in neurologic status
following extubation in a patient with severe respiratory
symptoms. [11]
Clinical considerations
In the cases one and two, the patients were diagnosed with
a psoas contracture. The psoas major may be related to
the respiratory system due to its anatomical relationship
with diaphragm. The psoas originates on the transverse
processes and lateral aspects of the vertebral bodies of
T12-L5 (and associated intervertebral discs). At its most
superior attachment, the psoas is related to the medial and
lateral arcuate ligaments, and the central tendon of the
diaphragm. [14] In case three, the jump sign elicited during
palpation of the scalenes highlights a more apparent involvement
of accessory respiratory muscles. Though this
has yet to be discussed in the literature, the involvement
of muscles related with respiration in all three cases is
an interesting finding following a respiratory illness. The
respiratory difficulties reported by the patients in this case
series may have required increased involvement of accessory
muscles and resultant muscular pain. Future clinical
or anatomical studies may be warranted to examine the
relationship between viral respiratory infections and related
muscular complaints.
Interestingly, all three patients complained of easy
bruising following SARS. In a review by Yang et al.,
thrombocytopenia was a common haematological change
reported in patients with SARS, though the exact cause
was not well understood. [15] Increased destruction and/or
decreased production of platelets in damaged lungs may
be a mechanism resulting in thrombocytopenia in severe
pulmonary conditions. [15] Clinicians should be aware of
this possibility and educate patients and/or modify treatment
plans accordingly.
Prognosis
As indicated above, the long-term prognosis of SARS and
its associated complications are unknown. Practitioners
must be prudent to re-evaluate frequently and ensure patients
are improving or maintaining pain/disability status.
Certainly, any deterioration in health status requires further
investigation and co-management as appropriate.
Law et al. presented a case series to examine factors
affecting return to work in 128 health care workers in
Hong Kong with musculoskeletal complaints two years
following in the SARS outbreak. [8] These authors noted patients
continued to experience difficulties in performing
activities of daily living and work tasks despite receiving
acute treatment and rehabilitation. Return to work (RTW)
has been suggested as an important measure of prognosis;
however, it is known that pain does not correlate
well with RTW. [8] A number of important considerations
beyond pain and functional ability impact a worker’s ability
and desire to return. [7, 8] Factors such as support in the
workplace, feasibility of providing alternate duties, and
the worker’s beliefs on the effects of return-to-work on
their injury progression must be considered. [8]
The lack of evidence regarding prognosis of neuromuscular
complaints in patients previously diagnosed with
SARS must be clearly communicated to patients, however,
it does not preclude treatment of conditions within
the chiropractic scope. The current case series suggests
the importance of appropriate use of outcome measures,
both generic and disease-specifi c. Althou gh patients may
report short-term pain relief and positive effects on health
related quality of life, outcome measures (VAS, NDI,
OBDI) may not demonstrate clinically relevant changes.
The inclusion of an outcome measure that allows the
patient to identify specific limitations (such as the MYMOP [16])
or addresses overall health related quality of life
(such as the SF-36 [17, 18]) may allow for the measurement of
subjective improvement.
Conclusion
Myopathic and neuropathic complications in patients
diagnosed with SARS have been reported previously;
however, to our knowledge, this is the first case series
to describe patient presentation in a chiropractic clinic.
Furthermore, we believe this case series represents a
longer follow-up period (up to six years following SARS
diagnosis) than was previously available in the literature.
Little is known regarding the cause of these neuromuscular
symptoms, and even less is known regarding treatment
options for these patients, particularly after the acute
illness has been controlled. [2, 5, 11, 13] Follow-up research
should be conducted to obtain more information about the
long-term outcomes of SARS.
Clinicians should be aware of the proposed pathogenesis
of neuromuscular complaints with a previous SARS
or other severe respiratory infections and ensure any
differential causes have been ruled out prior to commencing
a plan of management focused on conservative
therapies.
In this case series, three patients with varied neuromuscular
complaints reported short-term subjective improvements
in their pain experience and quality of life, and two
were able to return to work. Future research should investigate
the role of conservative care and manual therapies
for this type of patient population using subjective outcome
measures.
Acknowledgements:
The researchers gratefully acknowledge St John’s Rehab
Hospital for providing data and interprofessional collaboration.
Gratitude is expressed to the Canadian Memorial
Chiropractic College for their continued support of chiropractic
research.