FROM:
Alternative Medicine Review 2001 (Apr); 6 (2): 167–187 ~ FULL TEXT
Davis W. Lamson, MS, ND and Matthew S. Brignall, ND
Introduction
This paper is the second of a series examining the use of nutritional
supplements as chemopreventive agents. The first paper in the series examined
the data from human chemoprevention trials. [1]
In the present paper the mechanisms of action of promising treatments will
be discussed. In vitro and animal data are presented in support of the
agents as appropriate. The subject of chemoprevention with nutritional
agents has been the subject of voluminous research, and this review should
not be considered exhaustive. In cases where review articles already exist
regarding a particular agent (e.g., vitamin A, beta-carotene), these papers
should be consulted for a more complete summary.
The data presented in this review will focus on three common tumor types:
breast, prostate, and colon cancers. While data are available regarding
prevention of other tumor types, it is not as extensive as the data covered
in this paper. It is the opinion of the authors that agents with a clear
record of safety in human studies, evidence of chemoprevention in animal
studies, and well-understood mechanisms of action, should be considered
for clinical use pending results of large human trials.
Vitamin A
Vitamin A is obtained from the diet in the form of retinyl esters, which
are subsequently de-esterified to retinol. Retinol is then irreversibly
oxidized to become retinoic acid. Retinoic acid is the form of vitamin
A that binds with nuclear receptor sites and is necessary for the normal
growth and differentiation of epithelial tissue. [2]
The effects of vitamin A on cellular differentiation are mediated by two
separate classes of nuclear receptors, which in turn modify the effects
of many compounds, including prostaglandins, vitamin D, and steroid and
thyroid hormones. [3] Many studies have examined
the effects of isomers of vitamin A, including all-trans retinoic acid,
9-cis retinoic acid, and 13-cis retinoic acid. These isomers are all considered
to be interconverted in humans, and may be less hepatotoxic than retinol.
Animal research has demonstrated a chemopreventive effect of retinoids
in many types of cancer, including mammary cancer and colon cancer models. [4,5]
In vitro research has identified a number of promising mechanisms of action,
including decreasing serum insulin-like growth factor-1, inhibition of
5-alpha-reductase (the enzyme that catalyzes formation of dihydrotestosterone),
and up-regulation of transforming growth factor-beta. [4]
Epidemiological studies on the cancer preventive activity of dietary
vitamin A have been inconclusive, perhaps because of confounding factors.
Vitamin A is only present in animal foods, and thus dietary vitamin A intake
may be a marker for a high meat diet, a risk factor for many cancers. Prospective
trials have shown a very modest reduction in breast cancer risk in women
with the highest intakes of dietary vitamin A. [6]
One prospective epidemiological trial concluded that people taking supplemental
vitamin A had a reduced risk of developing breast cancer only if they were
in the lowest third of dietary vitamin A intake. [7]
Although the preclinical data have been promising, human studies using
vitamin A or retinoids as chemopreventive agents have been largely disappointing. [1]
It appears likely from the epidemiological data that the protective effect
of retinoids is limited to those who are deficient in dietary vitamin A.
It is also possible that the effect is limited to particular clinical situations
(e.g., bladder cancer, premenopausal breast cancer).
Carotenoids
Carotenoids are a family of conjugated polyene molecules found largely
in fruits and vegetables. Carotenoids are antioxidant, and certain carotenoids
can serve as precursors to retinol in humans. Of the more than 600 carotenoids,
beta carotene and lycopene have generated the most attention in the chemoprevention
field.
As discussed in the first paper in this series, [1]
beta carotene has been extensively studied in human trials as a chemopreventive
agent. In contrast to the human data, which have largely found beta carotene
supplementation to be associated with either no change or an increase in
cancer risk, epidemiological evidence has very strongly associated beta
carotene intake with reduction in the risk of cancer of many different
types. [8] Several schools of thought exist
regarding the discrepancy between epidemiology and human experimental data.
The first is that the human studies that used synthetic beta carotene
may not have used the right nutrient mixture for chemoprevention. [9]
Animal [10] and preliminary human research [11]
have shown mixed carotenes have a better chemopreventive action than synthetic
beta carotene. Secondly, it has been theorized that beta carotene may have
a pro-oxidant effect in vivo, [12] an effect
that could potentially be carcinogenic. These two theories are not mutually
exclusive, and it is possible both are true to some extent.
In vitro and animal studies have demonstrated a number of mechanisms
by which beta carotene can inhibit carcinogenesis, including antioxidant
activity, vitamin A precursor status, enhancement of gap junction communication,
an immunological effect, and induction of hepatic detoxification of carcinogens. [13]
Epidemiological studies have correlated both high intake [14]
and high serum concentrations [15] of lycopene
with reduced risk of prostate cancer. High adipose concentrations of lycopene
have been associated with a reduced risk of breast cancer. [16]
Lycopene has been shown to inhibit cancer cell growth in vitro, including
prostate, [17] breast, [18]
and lung [18] cancer cell lines. Animal studies
have shown lycopene inhibited development of mammary [19]
and colon [20] tumors.
Lycopene's mechanisms of action are somewhat obscure. A human crossover
trial found that consumption of tomatoes containing 16.5 mg of lycopene
for 21 days led to a 33-percent reduction in the amount of lymphocyte DNA
damage sustained after exposure to hydrogen peroxide ex vivo. [21]
Lycopene has been shown to reduce the growth-stimulating effect of insulin-like
growth factor on human breast cancer cells. [22]
Folic Acid
Expression of genes is controlled in part by DNA methylation. Hypomethylation
in the presence of folic acid deficiency has been theorized to be one of
the mechanisms by which cancer development can be encouraged. [23]
Both low folate status and DNA hypomethylation have been directly observed
in squamous cell lung cancer tissue compared to uninvolved bronchial mucosa
from the same patients. [24]
Epidemiological studies have shown low folate status to correlate with
increased risk of cancers of the cervix, lung, esophagus, brain, pancreas,
breast, and especially the colon. [25] The
benefits of folic acid may be greatest in those with significant deficiencies,
such as in patients taking sulfasalazine (a drug that depletes folate)
for ulcerative colitis. [26] Data from the
Nurses' Health Study indicate folic acid may at least partially offset
the increased breast cancer risk associated with consumption of alcohol. [27]
Human chemoprevention trials using folic acid have been performed and were
discussed in the first paper in this series. [1]
Vitamin B6
Increased likelihood of recurrence of breast cancer after mastectomy
has been correlated in preliminary studies with both poor metabolism of
a loading dose of L-tryptophan (indicating a functional deficiency of vitamin
B6), [28] and low urinary concentration of
4-pyridoxic acid, a major metabolite of vitamin B6. [29]
Dietary intake of vitamin B6 was found not to correlate at all with the
risk of breast cancer in a prospective study, however. [30]
Elevated levels of prolactin have been implicated in the pathophysiology
of both breast [31] and prostate [32]
cancers. Although B6 has been reported to suppress production of prolactin, [33]
some studies have failed to find this effect. [34,35]
Vitamin B12
Like folic acid, deficiency of vitamin B12 can lead to hypomethylation
of DNA.24 A role for vitamin B12 in the process of carcinogenesis has been
theorized since 1954, when abnormal cell types were found in the stomach
lining of patients with pernicious anemia. [36]
Women in the lowest quartile of serum vitamin B12 have been found to be
at increased risk of developing breast cancer in a prospective, epidemiological
study. [30] High mean corpuscular volume (MCV),
which is often a sign of either vitamin B12 or folate deficiency, has been
found to be predictive for a risk of colorectal polyps in men. [37]
Vitamin B12 treatment, together with folic acid, has been shown to reverse
a precancerous condition of the lung called squamous metaplasia1, [38]
but has not been used in primary prevention trials to date.
Vitamin C
Since vitamin C is a potent water-soluble antioxidant, it has generated
interest as a potential cancer preventive compound. Vitamin C is necessary
for the recycling of glutathione, another endogenous antioxidant. [39]
It has been theorized to protect against the ability of cancer cells to
invade tissue, in part by strengthening the cellular matrix. [40]
Vitamin C is directly cytotoxic to certain cancer cell lines in vitro.
This toxicity can be reversed by the addition of the enzyme catalase into
the medium, suggesting that the cell-killing effect of vitamin C is due
to a production of hydrogen peroxide within the cell. [41]
For most cancers, however, the only information available regarding the
chemopreventive activity of vitamin C is epidemiological research.
Retrospective dietary data show that each 300 mg of dietary vitamin
C intake is associated with a roughly 30-percent decrease in breast cancer
risk. [42] But when the same research group
analyzed prospective dietary studies (those that did dietary analysis before
the breast cancer diagnosis), no association between dietary vitamin C
and breast cancer risk was noted. Another prospective trial found no relationship
between plasma levels of ascorbate and risk of breast cancer in the subsequent
five years. [43]
Similar to breast cancer, no consistent relationship has emerged from
epidemiological studies between dietary vitamin C intake and prostate cancer
risk. [44] In one study, subjects taking vitamin
C supplements of any dose were found to have a 23-percent decreased risk
of developing prostate cancer (p > 0.05). [45]
Three of four intervention trials have found a significant benefit from
vitamin C supplementation, often along with other interventions, in the
treatment of colon polyp patients. In the first of these trials, administration
of 3 g/day of vitamin C for nine months led to a significant reduction
in polyp area in patients with polyposis coli compared to placebo. [46]
In a later trial, supplementation with 30,000 IU vitamin A palmitate, 70
mg d,l-alpha-tocopherol, and 1 g vitamin C per day for six months led to
a statistically significant reduction in abnormal cell proliferation in
patients with colorectal adenomas. [47] Also,
supplementation with 4 g/day vitamin C for four years, in addition to vitamin
E (400 IU) and a fiber supplement (22 g/day) was associated with a reduction
in polyps in patients with familial polyposis. [48]
In the negative trial, supplementation with 1 g/day vitamin C with 400
mg vitamin E for four years was not associated with reduced risk of recurrent
colonic adenoma. [49] While the data are not
unanimous, evidence exists to support the possibility that oral vitamin
C can help reduce the area, proliferation, and recurrence of precancerous
colon lesions.
Vitamin D
Vitamin D is a molecule with hormonal activity that is best known for
its effects on calcium metabolism. The metabolism and safety of vitamin
D has been recently reviewed, [50] with the
conclusion that supplementation with vitamin D is likely to be safe up
to levels approaching 10,000 IU/day. In addition to its role in calcium
metabolism, vitamin D appears to be important in regulation of cellular
growth and differentiation. Vitamin D has been shown to cause G1 cell cycle
arrest in prostate cancer cells, mediated through direct effects on p21,
p27, and E-cadherin. [51] Cells expressing
vitamin D receptors have been found in human tumor lines, including breast, [52]
prostate, [53] and colon. [54]
Vitamin D has been shown to reduce tumor secretion of type IV collagenases, [55]
and thus to reduce the number of metastases in an animal study. [56]
Epidemiology has long suggested a role for suboptimal vitamin D levels
in the risk of common tumor types. Exposure to low levels of UV light from
the sun is thought to account for about six percent of the U. S. variation
in prostate cancer mortality. [57] Low prediagnostic
serum levels of vitamin D have been correlated with increased risk of poorly
differentiated prostate tumors. [58] Women
with breast tumors that express vitamin D receptors (over 80 percent of
tumors) were found to have a significantly longer disease-free survival
than women whose cancers did not express this receptor. [52]
Vitamin D has been shown to reduce the proliferation of many tumor cell
lines in vitro, including breast, [52] prostate, [53]
and colon. [54] Treatment of animals with
synthetic vitamin D analogues has been shown to inhibit metastasis and
prolong survival time in breast cancer models. [59]
Vitamin D has been shown to inhibit the development of colon tumors in
animals, an effect the authors attributed partially to angiogenesis inhibition. [60]
Treatment of men having recurrent prostate cancer with between 0.5 and
2.5 mcg of oral calcitriol at bedtime (hypercalcemia was the dose-limiting
side effect) caused a significant slowing of the rate of prostate specific
antigen (PSA) increase compared to pretreatment levels in six of seven
patients. [61] In the seventh patient, a non-significant
trend toward reduction in the rate of PSA elevation was noted. In another
preliminary study, 44 percent of patients with hormone-refractory advanced
prostate cancer and bone metastases were found to have low serum concentrations
of vitamin D. [62] In this trial, supplementation
with 2000 IU vitamin D2 was associated with reduced bone pain and improved
quality of life from baseline.
Vitamin E
Several human intervention trials have examined the ability of vitamin
E to prevent carcinogenesis. Vitamin E, often as part of a larger nutritional
protocol, has been found to significantly reduce incidence of prostate,
bladder, and stomach cancers, as well as to prevent recurrence of colonic
adenomas in some, but not all studies.1 Both the Women's Health Study [63]
and the Physician's Health Study II [64] are
ongoing clinical trials with large patient populations following up on
the promising results of the preliminary vitamin E chemoprevention trials.
The subject of vitamin E in cancer prevention has been reviewed previously. [65,66]
These reviews discuss the extensive animal and in vitro research in support
of vitamin E in cancer prevention. Several mechanisms of vitamin E are
considered important in this regard, including stimulation of wild-type
p53 tumor suppressor gene, down-regulation of mutant p53, activation of
heat shock proteins, and an antiangiogenic effect mediated by blockage
of transforming growth factor-alpha (TGF-a). [65]
Selenium
Administration of 200 mcg selenium from yeast has been shown to reduce
the incidence of several types of cancers in a human trial. [1,67]
These data from the intervention trial confirm prior epidemiological studies
that have often shown low selenium status to be associated with increased
total cancer incidence. [68,69] In these studies,
the inverse association between selenium and gastrointestinal, prostate,
and lung cancers appears to be particularly strong. The relationship between
selenium status and breast cancer risk is less well-defined, with a large
geographical study showing clear inverse correlation in risk, [70]
but a prospective trial showing no significant relationship between toenail
selenium levels and breast cancer risk. [71]
Animal studies using a variety of different tumorigenesis models have largely
found selenium to have significant chemopreventive activity. [72]
Although there are several proposed mechanisms of action for selenium,
including induction of glutathione peroxidase, modulation of cytochrome
p450 systems, and immune modulation, [73]
the most important mechanism(s) probably remain elusive. Similarly, the
most effective form of selenium supplementation has not been definitively
demonstrated. While the majority of the animal chemoprevention studies
have used inorganic selenium, the most successful human trial used organic
selenium from yeast. Yeast-based selenium is approximately 40-percent selenomethionine,
20-percent other amino acid conjugates (e.g., selenocysteine, methylselenocysteine),
and 40-percent unidentified selenopeptides. [74]
In one animal study, co-administration of vitamin C nullified the chemopreventive
effect of inorganic selenium (selenite), but not that of selenomethionine. [75]
Calcium
A human intervention trial found that supplementation with 1200 mg calcium
carbonate per day led to a significant reduction in colonic adenoma recurrence
risk. [76] Both men and women with high dietary
intakes of calcium have been found to have a lower risk of developing colon
cancer. [77] Calcium has been found to protect
against colon carcinogenesis in animal models as well. [78]
Although the mechanism by which calcium appears to protect against colon
cancer formation is not entirely clear, it appears calcium may precipitate
toxic bile acids in the colonic lumen, thus reducing the rate of proliferation
of colonic epithelium. [79]
High calcium concentrations in drinking water have been correlated with
a significantly reduced risk of developing breast cancer, [80]
but not prostate cancer [81] in Taiwan. Animal
studies have not yet clarified a role for calcium in breast and prostate
cancer prevention.
Zinc
The zinc concentration of cancerous prostate tissue (146 mcg/g) has
been found to be significantly lower than that of normal prostate tissue
(1018 mcg/g) and BPH prostate tissue (1142 mcg/g). [82]
Whether this finding is a cause or an effect of neoplastic transformation
is still debated. Zinc has been found to inhibit the growth of prostate
cancer cell lines in vitro. [83] Cell cycle
arrest (G2/M) was noted in lines that had mutated or wild-type (normal)
p53 tumor suppressor gene. Men who take supplemental zinc were found to
have a borderline-significant 45-percent reduction in prostate cancer risk
in a case-control study. [84] Zinc inhibits
the activity of prostatic 5-alpha-reductase and may inhibit prostatic uptake
of the potential carcinogen cadmium. [85]
Diets containing high concentrations of zinc, with or without high levels
of copper, were found to be ineffective in preventing mammary cancers in
an animal study. [86] Serum zinc concentrations
have been found to be mildly reduced in patients with breast cancer and
slightly elevated in patients with colon cancer compared with healthy controls. [87]
Another study found a strong positive correlation between high serum zinc
concentrations and breast cancer. [88]
Table 1 summarizes the cancer preventive
potential of vitamins and minerals.
Coenzyme Q10
Coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10) is a lipid-soluble antioxidant involved in the
production of ATP via the electron transport chain. Tumor tissue levels
of this nutrient have been found to be significantly lower in breast cancers
than in surrounding normal tissue.8 [89] A
series of preliminary reports suggest a potent treatment effect of CoQ10
in advanced breast cancer. [90,91] These reports
have methodological flaws that make them difficult to interpret, however.
An unpublished human trial found CoQ10 treatment to cause regression of
prostate tumors, as well. [92] Colon cancer
tissue contains significantly higher levels of CoQ10 than surrounding tissues,
for reasons that are unclear. [93] Future
animal and human studies will need to elucidate the role of CoQ10 in prevention
and treatment of cancers.
Quercetin
Quercetin is a flavonoid present in many foods of plant origin. The
anticancer mechanisms of quercetin have been reviewed in a recent issue
of this journal. [94] Quercetin has been shown
to have a preventive effect in a number of different animal tumor models,
including oral cancer, [95] fibrosarcoma, [96]
skin, [97] mammary, [98]
and multi-organ tumorigenesis. [99] Colon
cancer models have yielded conflicting results, with studies that show
decreased risk, [100] no change, [101]
or even increased risk. [102] Quercetin was
found to be superior to tamoxifen in vitro as a growth inhibitor of the
estrogen-receptor negative MCF-7 breast cancer cell line. [103]
Although early research on quercetin showed a minimal absorption of
the compound, newer research has refuted these findings. [94]
Quercetin chalcone has been proposed as a more absorbable form of quercetin
due to its increased water solubility, but has not undergone human trials
to demonstrate this ability. Quercetin chalcone administration has been
shown to slow the growth of human colon tumors transplanted into mice. [104]